<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. police could get ‘pain beam’ weapons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sfbayview.com/2009/us-police-could-get-%e2%80%98pain-beam%e2%80%99-weapons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sfbayview.com/2009/us-police-could-get-%e2%80%98pain-beam%e2%80%99-weapons/</link>
	<description>Black liberation news and views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:04:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Schuller</title>
		<link>http://sfbayview.com/2009/us-police-could-get-%e2%80%98pain-beam%e2%80%99-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-2785</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Schuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfbayview.com/?p=2354#comment-2785</guid>
		<description>I would be very interested in a civilian application of this device if it could be made to weigh less than 3 pounds, have a range of 7 to 10 yards, produce its effect spread throughout a cone of 15 to 180 degrees be capable of three to five (or more) repetitions of a strength sufficient to discourage a large predator (Kodiak Brown, Grizzly or Polar Bear) or other large, dangerous animal (cow moose with calf, etc).

We could relieve backpackers and campers of a lot of bear repellant and/or heavy revolvers or shotguns typically carried in our woods for protection and reduce the number of DLP (defense of life or property) dead bears (and mauled hikers who didn&#039;t shoot that well).

If you use this idea, I and my hiking partner want a pair of free ones.

I wouldn&#039;t even mind if the civilian version produced a 360 degree full circle effect.  I would rather experience discomfort than a mauling or have to go tracking a wounded bear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be very interested in a civilian application of this device if it could be made to weigh less than 3 pounds, have a range of 7 to 10 yards, produce its effect spread throughout a cone of 15 to 180 degrees be capable of three to five (or more) repetitions of a strength sufficient to discourage a large predator (Kodiak Brown, Grizzly or Polar Bear) or other large, dangerous animal (cow moose with calf, etc).</p>
<p>We could relieve backpackers and campers of a lot of bear repellant and/or heavy revolvers or shotguns typically carried in our woods for protection and reduce the number of DLP (defense of life or property) dead bears (and mauled hikers who didn&#8217;t shoot that well).</p>
<p>If you use this idea, I and my hiking partner want a pair of free ones.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t even mind if the civilian version produced a 360 degree full circle effect.  I would rather experience discomfort than a mauling or have to go tracking a wounded bear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: sfbayview.com @ 2012-05-24 17:44:48 -->
