<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republican candidates ignore the Black vote while the Democrats continue to take it for granted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sfbayview.com/2010/republican-candidates-ignore-the-black-vote-while-the-democrats-continue-to-take-it-for-granted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sfbayview.com/2010/republican-candidates-ignore-the-black-vote-while-the-democrats-continue-to-take-it-for-granted/</link>
	<description>Black liberation news and views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crypticguise</title>
		<link>http://sfbayview.com/2010/republican-candidates-ignore-the-black-vote-while-the-democrats-continue-to-take-it-for-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-9247</link>
		<dc:creator>crypticguise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 02:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfbayview.com/?p=13872#comment-9247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact is that Black American voters aren&#039;t very well informed on the issues - ever.  If they vote, they pull the lever for the same people who have taken them for granted for years - the Democrat Party. 
 
No one in the Republican Party should beg for a black vote.  Sensible, issue-oriented black Americans find it very comfortable to be arm in arm with Americans who believe in the Constitution and are basically conservative in their values.   These are Conservatives and Independents who see a future with a Conservative Republican Party.   
 
The Tea Party folks are making it abundantly obvious that they are not going to accept liberal Republicans who act like socialist Democrats once elected. 
 
If black Americans want a Socialist-Marxist country, they should continue to vote for the Socialist-Marxists in the Congress, Democrats, and the White House.  If black Americans want a country where we all have an opportunity to succeed built on our ability and hard work and believe we should preserve and protect our Constitution and Declaration of Independence go to a Tea Party Rally and meet some like people of all colors. 
 
Another thing black Americans should consider, dumping lying organizations like the NAACP who are slandering good American people in the Tea Party Movement as racists.  The day you can call someone a racist and it sticks...is OVER.   
 
Open your eyes, use your common sense, read, talk to other people who believe the government is NOT the answer, it is the problem.  Then VOTE.   
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is that Black American voters aren&#039;t very well informed on the issues &#8211; ever.  If they vote, they pull the lever for the same people who have taken them for granted for years &#8211; the Democrat Party. </p>
<p>No one in the Republican Party should beg for a black vote.  Sensible, issue-oriented black Americans find it very comfortable to be arm in arm with Americans who believe in the Constitution and are basically conservative in their values.   These are Conservatives and Independents who see a future with a Conservative Republican Party.   </p>
<p>The Tea Party folks are making it abundantly obvious that they are not going to accept liberal Republicans who act like socialist Democrats once elected. </p>
<p>If black Americans want a Socialist-Marxist country, they should continue to vote for the Socialist-Marxists in the Congress, Democrats, and the White House.  If black Americans want a country where we all have an opportunity to succeed built on our ability and hard work and believe we should preserve and protect our Constitution and Declaration of Independence go to a Tea Party Rally and meet some like people of all colors. </p>
<p>Another thing black Americans should consider, dumping lying organizations like the NAACP who are slandering good American people in the Tea Party Movement as racists.  The day you can call someone a racist and it sticks&#8230;is OVER.   </p>
<p>Open your eyes, use your common sense, read, talk to other people who believe the government is NOT the answer, it is the problem.  Then VOTE.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mulligan</title>
		<link>http://sfbayview.com/2010/republican-candidates-ignore-the-black-vote-while-the-democrats-continue-to-take-it-for-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-8850</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfbayview.com/?p=13872#comment-8850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason blacks voted overwhelmingly for Prop. 8 is bigotry.  Al Sharpton himself said as much soon after the vote.  Frankly, it was a betrayal of homosexuals by black voters even though homosexuals are traditionally liberal and have supported black causes consistently in the past.  Blaming a campaign machine is really an insult to the intelligence of black voters since they should have known Prop. 8 was discriminatory from the start with or without any influence from any political party. 
 
As for the parties ignoring people, I&#039;ll agree with that.  Republicans are increasingly leaning towards corporate and religious interests and seem to have lost their core concept of fiscal responsibility.  Also, if the Republican platform is budget cuts and heavy law enforcement, how does that appeal to black voters?  Democrats are just weak, plain and simple.  They know that their voters are anyone who is just horrified with Republicans.  They don&#039;t need to reach out to anyone since their voters are trapped by &quot;not voting for Republicans.&quot;  I guess the question is this, if you aren&#039;t going to vote Democrat, then who are you going to vote for?  It&#039;s a rotten situation but we&#039;re all in it, not just black people. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason blacks voted overwhelmingly for Prop. 8 is bigotry.  Al Sharpton himself said as much soon after the vote.  Frankly, it was a betrayal of homosexuals by black voters even though homosexuals are traditionally liberal and have supported black causes consistently in the past.  Blaming a campaign machine is really an insult to the intelligence of black voters since they should have known Prop. 8 was discriminatory from the start with or without any influence from any political party. </p>
<p>As for the parties ignoring people, I&#039;ll agree with that.  Republicans are increasingly leaning towards corporate and religious interests and seem to have lost their core concept of fiscal responsibility.  Also, if the Republican platform is budget cuts and heavy law enforcement, how does that appeal to black voters?  Democrats are just weak, plain and simple.  They know that their voters are anyone who is just horrified with Republicans.  They don&#039;t need to reach out to anyone since their voters are trapped by &quot;not voting for Republicans.&quot;  I guess the question is this, if you aren&#039;t going to vote Democrat, then who are you going to vote for?  It&#039;s a rotten situation but we&#039;re all in it, not just black people. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GlobalAgloAmericanSerfdom</title>
		<link>http://sfbayview.com/2010/republican-candidates-ignore-the-black-vote-while-the-democrats-continue-to-take-it-for-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-8781</link>
		<dc:creator>GlobalAgloAmericanSerfdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfbayview.com/?p=13872#comment-8781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harry Alford made some good points about the NAACP and Al Sharpton in the article I read (Although I am not Glenn Beck supporter): 
 
Chasing Glenn Beck  
Commentator’s message on point – and progressives know it 
 
Published Monday, August 30, 2010 6:02 pm 
 
By Harry Alford, NNPA  
 
I never thought it would have gone this low so fast.   
 
On the anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech the major civil rights groups or should we now say “human rights” groups coalescing together not to celebrate the anniversary but to protest a white cable television icon’s celebration of the event.  Something is very strange about this.  It is like there is no agenda any longer for our human rights groups from an African-American perspective.  They are now fighting for immigrants, gays and lesbians and ex-offenders regardless of their color.  Direct action for African- Americans is fading fast and that is not a good thing.  
Just why are they upset with Glenn Beck?  I believe it is because of his criticism of President Barack Obama. It seems that President Obama’s administration can fend for itself but these groups feel it is their duty to defend the honor and reputation of this publicly elected official.  What it has come to is Democrats versus Republicans even though these groups are 501(c) 3 organizations which are supposed to be nonpartisan. The truth is they are terribly partisan to a fault. In essence, former civil rights groups are now human rights groups terribly influenced by the labor movement (unions) and hopelessly directed by the Democratic Party. They represent the Democrat machine not the people. Please be aware of this fact.  
From my black viewpoint, Mr. Beck has been on the “1” in discussing the contributions of Frederick Douglas, Booker T. Washington, George Washington Carver and many others.   So why are these human rights Democratic groups bashing him.  Could it be the money they receive from the DNC that is doing it?  Probably, it is reported that the Department of Education is giving one organizer $1.5 million to talk about education with Secretary Arne Duncan, who attended the protest rally, by the way.  
I went on the Glenn Beck show last December after a series of regrets.  I finally relented just to see what would happen.  We talked about the racist innuendos of California Senator Barbara Boxer and the discrimination by construction unions in employment and contracting.  The professionalism of his staff was very impressive.  More than that, they were quite diverse with blacks interacting at the management level.  My wife and I must admit that the professionalism of his staff is probably better than that of any other talk show host.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Alford made some good points about the NAACP and Al Sharpton in the article I read (Although I am not Glenn Beck supporter):</p>
<p>Chasing Glenn Beck </p>
<p>Commentator’s message on point – and progressives know it</p>
<p>Published Monday, August 30, 2010 6:02 pm</p>
<p>By Harry Alford, NNPA </p>
<p>I never thought it would have gone this low so fast.  </p>
<p>On the anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech the major civil rights groups or should we now say “human rights” groups coalescing together not to celebrate the anniversary but to protest a white cable television icon’s celebration of the event.  Something is very strange about this.  It is like there is no agenda any longer for our human rights groups from an African-American perspective.  They are now fighting for immigrants, gays and lesbians and ex-offenders regardless of their color.  Direct action for African- Americans is fading fast and that is not a good thing. </p>
<p>Just why are they upset with Glenn Beck?  I believe it is because of his criticism of President Barack Obama. It seems that President Obama’s administration can fend for itself but these groups feel it is their duty to defend the honor and reputation of this publicly elected official.  What it has come to is Democrats versus Republicans even though these groups are 501(c) 3 organizations which are supposed to be nonpartisan. The truth is they are terribly partisan to a fault. In essence, former civil rights groups are now human rights groups terribly influenced by the labor movement (unions) and hopelessly directed by the Democratic Party. They represent the Democrat machine not the people. Please be aware of this fact. </p>
<p>From my black viewpoint, Mr. Beck has been on the “1” in discussing the contributions of Frederick Douglas, Booker T. Washington, George Washington Carver and many others.   So why are these human rights Democratic groups bashing him.  Could it be the money they receive from the DNC that is doing it?  Probably, it is reported that the Department of Education is giving one organizer $1.5 million to talk about education with Secretary Arne Duncan, who attended the protest rally, by the way. </p>
<p>I went on the Glenn Beck show last December after a series of regrets.  I finally relented just to see what would happen.  We talked about the racist innuendos of California Senator Barbara Boxer and the discrimination by construction unions in employment and contracting.  The professionalism of his staff was very impressive.  More than that, they were quite diverse with blacks interacting at the management level.  My wife and I must admit that the professionalism of his staff is probably better than that of any other talk show host.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann_Garrison</title>
		<link>http://sfbayview.com/2010/republican-candidates-ignore-the-black-vote-while-the-democrats-continue-to-take-it-for-granted/comment-page-1/#comment-8770</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann_Garrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sfbayview.com/?p=13872#comment-8770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So glad to hear someone finally saying this. So long as Blacks, LGBT people, and peace and human rights activists allow themselves to be considered the birthright of the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party will put all its energies into courting our antagonists, such as Reverend Rick Warren, whom Barack Obama heavily courted in 2008. Warren had endorsed George Bush and been handsomely rewarded with $15 billion + in PEPFAR, President&#039;s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, funds, which Warren used to build his evangelical and abstinence only fiefdom in Africa, most of all in Uganda and Rwanda, and to further curry favor with Rwandan President Paul Kagame. In 2008, Warren endorsed Obama and was handsomely rewarded, not only with an invitation to pray at Obama&#039;s Inauguration, but then with $50 billion in PEPFAR funding. Today Warren prayed at Kagame&#039;s inauguration, even as Kagame&#039;s army is accused of genocide against Rwandan Hutu refugees and Congolese Hutus in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This makes it clear that Obama will risk the Reverend Rick Warren vote in 2012 if he ends the special U.S. relationship with President Paul Kagame when the official version of the report is released on October 1st, 2012.  
 
Here&#039;s hoping that neither the African American nor human rights community, of all colors, will allow themselves to be so taken for granted that we tolerate that---genocide, in the heart of Africa.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So glad to hear someone finally saying this. So long as Blacks, LGBT people, and peace and human rights activists allow themselves to be considered the birthright of the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party will put all its energies into courting our antagonists, such as Reverend Rick Warren, whom Barack Obama heavily courted in 2008. Warren had endorsed George Bush and been handsomely rewarded with $15 billion + in PEPFAR, President&#039;s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, funds, which Warren used to build his evangelical and abstinence only fiefdom in Africa, most of all in Uganda and Rwanda, and to further curry favor with Rwandan President Paul Kagame. In 2008, Warren endorsed Obama and was handsomely rewarded, not only with an invitation to pray at Obama&#039;s Inauguration, but then with $50 billion in PEPFAR funding. Today Warren prayed at Kagame&#039;s inauguration, even as Kagame&#039;s army is accused of genocide against Rwandan Hutu refugees and Congolese Hutus in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This makes it clear that Obama will risk the Reverend Rick Warren vote in 2012 if he ends the special U.S. relationship with President Paul Kagame when the official version of the report is released on October 1st, 2012.  </p>
<p>Here&#039;s hoping that neither the African American nor human rights community, of all colors, will allow themselves to be so taken for granted that we tolerate that&#8212;genocide, in the heart of Africa.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: sfbayview.com @ 2013-05-24 02:38:32 by W3 Total Cache -->