Support SF BayView
Donate or Subscribe to SF Bay View
Follow Us Twitter Facebook

SF 8: Paying the costs

February 17, 2010

Pack the courtroom Thursday, Feb. 18, 9 a.m., in Dept. 22, 850 Bryant St., San Francisco, to support the only remaining SF 8 defendant, Francisco Torres, who will be in the courtroom! Dismiss Cisco’s case, a 36-year-old case based on torture!

by Mumia Abu-Jamal

SF 8 defendants and supporters celebrate the dismissal on July 6, 2009, of all charges against all of them except Francisco Torres (second from left), who was big-hearted enough to join the celebration. To persuade Jerry Brown to dismiss the case against Cisco Torres, sign the Open Letter at www.freethesf8.org. – Photo: Scott Braley
As the once front page story of the San Francisco 8 case winds down, bills are becoming due.

The San Francisco 8 refers to eight former members of the Black Panther Party, charged with involvement in a 1971 homicide.

There is little doubt now that the case was initiated more for political reasons than legal ones. The San Francisco District Attorney’s Office thought so little of the case that it declined to prosecute. California’s attorney general opted to try it instead.

Almost from day one, the case began unraveling. A few guys took plea bargains to relatively minor charges, resulting in probation. Within months, charges against five of the men were dismissed. Only one still has charges pending.

The men – Herman Bell, Ray Boudreaux, Henry Jones, Jalil Muntaquim, Richard O’Neal, Harold Taylor and Francisco Torres – now middle aged and older, stood firm and refused to flip on each other. Some of them were tortured back in 1975, when charges were originally dismissed. (One man, John Bowman, died before trial.)

Why this case? Initially, it is the extraordinary resources and papers made available to local jurisdictions by the federal government in the aftermath of 9/11; secondly, California Attorney General Edmund “Jerry” Brown was anxious to run for governor and thought this case would prove the right vehicle.

But what was sensational in 1971 loses some of its punch in 2001. The newest headlines from the case aren’t what the cash strapped state wants to hear.

San Francisco’s Public Defenders Office has filed for $2 million in reimbursements owed by the City for its defense of the men. They are seeking that sum because the state, not San Francisco County, took up the prosecution of the 36-year-old case.

© Copyright 2010 Mumia Abu-Jamal. Read Mumia’s brand new book, “Jailhouse Lawyers: Prisoners Defending Prisoners v. the U.S.A.,” available from City Lights Publishing, www.citylights.com or (415) 362-8193. Keep updated at www.freemumia.com. For Mumia’s commentaries, visit www.prisonradio.org. For recent interviews with Mumia, visit www.blockreportradio.com. Encourage the media to publish and broadcast Mumia’s commentaries and interviews. Send our brotha some love and light at: Mumia Abu-Jamal, AM 8335, SCI-Greene, 175 Progress Dr., Waynesburg PA 15370.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

BayView Classifieds - ads, opportunities, announcements
San Francisco Comcast