by Nyese Joshua
Ms. Maxwell reminds me of that old cereal commercial where the children say something like, “Give it to Mikey. He’ll eat it. He eats anything.” Ms. Maxwell is the Mikey for big money interests in San Francisco and other principalities in high dark places.
When it comes to committee assignments, the other members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors say, “Put Sophie on it because, like Mikey, she’ll vote for anything!” Anything they tell her to vote for, that is. But as for her constituents and the people of San Francisco, she has demonstrated she couldn’t care less.
As our RECALL effort moves forward, I am asked, WHY RECALL? And more importantly, WHY NOW? Ms. Maxwell will term out in January 2011. Some have said: “She only has one more year. Why put the energy and investment in a RECALL with such a short amount of time left? And since the mayor would appoint the successor, then really, what is the point?” These are valid and excellent concerns. And the answer I present is this: RECALL is IMPERATIVE to SCRAMBLE THE MACHINE.
Rest assured Ms. Maxwell’s controllers do not want to see her moved from that seat one second before January 2011. They have a well established relationship and flow with Ms. Maxwell right where she is. Putting the sledge hammer of RECALL to that coup will speak volumes to that power structure.
With regard to the mayor’s appointment of a successor, this is not the focus of the RECALL. The focus is the RESOUNDING VOICE of the District 10 community saying, “We see you and we see what you are doing against our best interests, and we will not shrink away this year while you bulldoze legislation through that will effectively annihilate District 10.”
The most recent example of the negative impact Ms. Maxwell had on this community is when her coffer-fillers aided her in manipulating the language of a resolution presented by Supervisor John Avalos on behalf of District 10 regarding the reinstatement of the Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) as it was right before the Navy disbanded it because of that board’s insistence that the Navy hold to its responsibility to truly clean the Shipyard and not allow early transfer of a Superfund site of Chernobyl proportions.
Even after about 100 people came to a hearing at City Hall to testify in support of reinstating the RAB after Ms. Maxwell’s string pullers helped her to change the language of the resolution to make it ineffective, so much so that Supervisor Avalos removed his name from the resolution.
Ms. Maxwell has become an enemy to her own professed commitments to District 10. In the election pamphlet for her 2000 campaign she stated that she supported Proposition P, which in short demanded that the Navy clean the Shipyard to residential standards.
What has happened to Ms. Maxwell? Was she lying to her constituents when she ran for re-election or is she lying to herself now? Whether she was lying then or she has become an indifferent liar over time supports the fact that she does not need to sit in that critical Supervisorial seat not one minute longer than June 2010, on the day after she is RECALLED.
WHY RECALL? WHY NOW? The coffer-fillers are already scrambling. Ms. Maxwell was served the Notice of Intention to Recall on Dec. 10, 2009. The SCRAMBLE is already beginning. Small businesses that had been shunned for years by Ms. Maxwell’s office are now receiving mailings about her wonderful efforts to aid their businesses. Ms. Maxwell, you are a day late and a dollar short.
The issues generating this RECALL effort are not light or petty or personal. We are demanding Ms. Maxwell’s removal because of her voting record, her support of legislation that has negatively impacted the community. Equally, her lack of generating substantive community people building legislation related to issues that literally bombard the largest district in San Francisco has effectively demonstrated her disillusionment with hopeful possibilities for District 10, as well as her complete disregard for our critically important long term health.
However, challenging the wiles of the political process engulfed me some three and a half years ago when I learned that the big developer Lennar had been sending its workers home due to the excessive hazardous dust exposure on the jobsite, but Lennar was not alerting the immediate surrounding community that they should be closing their windows and staying indoors or whatever the precautions would be to protect their health and safety.
After much pleading with the San Francisco Health Department and a slew of other agencies, finally the San Francisco Board of Education submitted a resolution in support of a work stoppage at the Lennar site on the Shipyard in order to allow an independent company to test a sampling of residents, including children and the elderly, to ensure their health considerations were being put first, as the Precautionary Principles of San Francisco mandate. Hundreds of people from the community came to City Hall to speak on their support of this temporary work stoppage.
I thought surely once our Supervisor heard our outcry she would intelligently and empathetically consider the cause and vote in support of her vast constituency who came to address her and her colleagues in an orderly and procedurally correct manner. SURELY, she needs to reconsider her support of this insidious process of poisoning the weakest as well as the healthiest people of the community.
Oops! I WAS WRONG. She in fact became the pivotal vote that caused this well supported community and citywide resolution to be voted DOWN! With her NO vote she solidified her complete disregard for the children, the elderly, and really even those who are healthy and wealthy and live in Bayview. Everyone should take note, as asbestos and other chemically polluted air does not stop at the children and the elderly and the poor.
In this brief article an additional compelling point for RECALL NOW I must present to you is the looming most “slap-in-the-face” affront to District 10: DID MS. MAXWELL HAVE HER OWN PROPERTY EXEMPTED FROM THE BAYVIEW HUNTERS POINT (BVHP) REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA?
Commenting on “the new map for the 1400+ acres proposed for this project [the BVHP Redevelopment Plan] that came out to all the Supervisors yesterday,” a reader wrote on May 9, 2007, in response to a story on the website BeyondChron.org: “Right in the middle of it there are three or more small parcels NOT subject to the rezoning in this plan. Those would be parcels owned by Sophie Maxwell.”
Has the supervisorial captain of the Titanic of the BVHP Redevelopment Project Area prepared a separate escape for when the iceberg of Redevelopment hits the ship of BVHP residents who have not been afforded the luxury of opting out of the massive concocted project area? If she has already separated herself, then District 10 residents have a duty to make it official and unseat Ms. Maxwell.
Ms. Maxwell and those she truly serves are like a mountain lion pouncing upon the heads of the community of D10, poised in this last year to grip their political controlling fangs around the back of our necks to inflict that deadly legislative bite in order to finally remove any and all opposition to the wrecking plans scheduled for this community. Now anyone would fight against an obvious mountain lion attack. Make no mistake: D10 is under silent siege being carried out by District Supervisor Sophie Maxwell.
I implore you to get involved in depth and consider your support of this RECALL. The proponents are awaiting the certification by the San Francisco Elections Department of the petition for circulation. Then we will need everyone’s help to gather the signatures of a minimum of 7,529 voters registered in District 10 by Feb. 8. To get involved, come to the weekly town hall meetings in the school at 195 Kiska Road at 7 p.m. every Thursday.
Nyese Joshua is a long time resident of Bayview Hunters Point and a San Francisco native. She can be reached by emailing email@example.com.