Support SF BayView
Donate or Subscribe to SF Bay View
Follow Us Twitter Facebook

Is the Fukushima nuclear plant breakdown worse than Chernobyl?

April 15, 2011

by Janette D. Sherman, M.D.

Love lavished on the children in this orphanage near Chernobyl cannot cure the terrible effects of radiation. To see a series of photos taken by this photographer in 1997, 11 years after the catastrophe, go to http://todayspictures.slate.com/inmotion/essay_chernobyl/. – Photo: ©Paul Fusco, Magnum Photos 1997
A little over six months ago I wrote: “Given profound weather effects (earthquakes, floods, tsunamis etc.), human fallibility and military conflicts, many believe that it is only a matter of time before there is another nuclear catastrophe. Nuclear fallout knows no state or national boundaries and will contribute to an increase in illnesses, decrease in intelligence and instability throughout the world. The economic costs of radioactive pollution and care of contaminated citizens are staggering. No country can maintain itself if its citizens are economically, intellectually, politically and socially impoverished.”

(My submission, which had been requested by the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, was ultimately rejected … too alarmist?)

While thousands of miles and 25 years separate the sites and the events that led to the catastrophes at Fukushima and Chernobyl, the effects will be very similar – and will remain so for years to decades to centuries.

After Chernobyl, there was a delay in collecting and releasing information. The nuclear industry and many governments are reluctant to alarm the public, but the public has a right to know what the risks are and how, if possible, to avoid those risks – as much as possible.

The science of radiobiology is not new. When we know the identity of a radioisotope, we can predict how it will interact with living matter – human, animal or plant. Decades of research have confirmed that radioisotopes become deposited in various parts of living systems.

In humans, I-131 and I-129 concentrate in the thyroid, Cs-137 in soft tissue and Sr-90 in teeth and bones.

Radiation affects intelligence too. These youngsters live in the Novinski Asylum in Minsk, Belarus, near Chernobyl. – Photo: ©Paul Fusco, Magnum Photos 1997
Key to understanding effects is the difference between external and internal radiation. While external radiation, as from x-rays, neutron, gamma and cosmic rays, can harm and kill, internal radiation – alpha and beta particles – when absorbed by ingestion and inhalation release damaging energy in direct contact with tissue and cells.

There is serious concern for the workers at the Fukushima plant because of their proximity to the disabled reactors and to the fuel rods that have lost their protective cover of water. Some of the Fukushima workers, as with the “liquidators” at Chernobyl, are exposed to dangerous levels of gamma and neutron radiation.

Those not in close proximity to those sources of radiation will be spared some of the intense exposure but will not escape the exposure from radionuclides that emit alpha and beta particles, as well as gamma radiation. These enter the bodies of humans by inhalation and ingestion of food and water.

Of the Chernobyl “liquidators,” the young and healthy men and women who worked to stop the fires and to contain the release of radioactivity from Chernobyl, by 2005, some 125,000 – or 15 percent – of the estimated total of 830,000 were dead, mostly from circulatory and blood diseases and malignancies.

Children born to liquidator families were seriously affected with birth defects and thyroid diseases, including cancer, and loss of intellect. As for other children, based upon the work of multiple researchers, it is estimated that in the heavily contaminated areas of Belarus, only 20 percent of children are considered healthy, placing an enormous burden upon governmental resources to provide medical care and education for those affected.

“Between 1989-1990, a notable increase in genetic malformations in animals was noted. The following year, almost 400 deformed animals were born. In 1990, Igor Kostin took photographs of these mutations, including this eight-legged foal, and sent them to Mikhail Gorbachev to encourage him set up an international commission to investigate the causes of the changes; he received no reply from the Soviet leader. In addition, Kostin gave a set of photographs to a Supreme Soviet deputy Youri Chtcherbak, who showed them to the Congress of Deputies in Moscow, proclaiming, ‘If you don't want your children to look like this, you need to act.’ Since then, no government commission was created to investigate the phenomena caused, according to some, by radioactive leaks from the sarcophagus,” according to Corbis’ caption for this photo, which appears in an April 14, 2006, gallery of Chernobyl photos by Igor Kostin in Der Spiegel. – Photo: Igor Kostin, Corbis
Many pro-nuclear critics have downplayed the risks from Chernobyl, attributing concerns to “radio-phobia”; but documentation of disease is not limited to the human population. With few exceptions, animal and plant systems that were studied demonstrated structural abnormalities in offspring, loss of tolerance and viability, and genetic changes. Wild animals and plants do not drink alcohol, smoke or worry about compensation – so those factors cannot be held responsible.

When a radiation release occurs, we do not know in advance the part of the biosphere it will contaminate, the animals, plants and people that will be affected, nor the amount or duration of harm. In many cases, damage is random, depending upon the health, age and status of development and the amount, kind and variety of radioactive contamination that reaches humans, animals and plants.

For this reason, open and transparent data must be collected and maintained for all biological systems – human, animal, plant. We must have international support of research on the consequences of the Fukushima, and support of Chernobyl research must continue in order to mitigate the ongoing and increasing damage. Access to information must be transparent and open to all, across all borders.

The World Health Organization (WHO) must sever its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in place since 1959, and assume independent responsibility in support of international health.

Given the emerging problems from the Fukushima nuclear plants and the continuing and known problems caused by the Chernobyl catastrophe, we must ask ourselves this: Before we commit ourselves to economic and technological support of nuclear energy, who, what and where are we willing to sacrifice and for how long?

Janette D. Sherman, M.D., is the author of “Life’s Delicate Balance: Causes and Prevention of Breast Cancer and Chemical Exposure and Disease” and is a specialist in internal medicine and toxicology. She edited the book “Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and Nature,” written by A.V. Yablokov, V.B. Nesterenko and A.V. Nesterenko, published by the New York Academy of Sciences in 2009. Her primary interest is the prevention of illness through public education. She can be reached at toxdoc.js@verizon.net and www.janettesherman.com.

 

 

3 thoughts on “Is the Fukushima nuclear plant breakdown worse than Chernobyl?

  1. bernie

    Look at the time line for the cleaning up of three miles island one. It took more than 15 ys to finish the main task.
    Fukushima's is 100 time more worse that 3 miles' and things become more danger—–why #4 with spent fuels got too many time of fires. Answer is: the cladding had already melt by extreme hot and hydrogen been generated by the reaction of water with Zirconium of the cladding. Don't forget that the spent fuel is hundred thousand times danger than the new one(because of Plutonium!!!!!)
    Within a matter months the conventional energy materials such as oil and natural gas will triple triple jump and all of the world will suffer from that.

    Reply
  2. @AnnGarrison

    Literal genocide. A Native American friend of mine, from Navajoland, once showed me a letter she had written to the head of the California Public Utilities Commission, about dirty energy aggression on the Navajo Reservation. It said, "You people have attacked us even in the genes."

    Reply
  3. flyingcuttlefish

    I think it will go down in history as much worse. They haven't even begun to build a shell around around/under it. They are just pouring contaminated water into the sea.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

BayView Classifieds - ads, opportunities, announcements
TOP STORES
RingCentral
Rebtel
Phone.com