Support SF BayView
Donate or Subscribe to SF Bay View
Follow Us Twitter Facebook

Do American taxpayers really want to pay Rwanda to keep Victoire Ingabire behind bars?

September 29, 2011

by Aimable Mugara

Victoire Ingabire, now on trial after nearly a year in maximum security prison, has the look of a Rwandan prisoner – shaved head and pink uniform – but the heart of a Rwandan freedom fighter. Ian Edwards, one of her attorneys, is at the far left, and her other attorney, Gatera Gashebana, stands behind them. – Photo: Alice Muhirwa
According to the ACLU, the inspector general of the U.S. Justice Department reported that the FBI Terrorist Watch List had over 700,000 names in its database as of April 2007 – and that the list was growing by an average of over 20,000 records per month. At that rate, the list would now contain over 1 million names. The ACLU thinks the list is bloated with the names of many people who are no threat to the U.S. government.

No one in the U.S., however, has gone on trial for terrorism because he or she announced an intention to run for president, though that is the situation of Mrs. Victoire Ingabire in Rwanda, a close ally and military partner of the U.S., which has also received over $1 billion in U.S. foreign aid over the past 10 years.

Ingabire left a very comfortable life, a good job and a loving family in the Netherlands to return to her native Rwanda to stand for the presidency in January 2010. She made every attempt to participate in the political process that Rwandan President Paul Kagame and those surrounding him insist is democratic, but instead she now stands in the dock in Rwanda’s capital Kigali, charged with

1) forming an armed group with the aim of destabilizing the country,

2) complicity in acts of terrorism,

3) conspiracy against the government by use of war and terrorism,

4) inciting the masses to revolt against the government,

5) genocide ideology and

6) divisionism.

Western mainstream media had been claiming that Rwanda had progressed past its dark history, the 1994 genocide. Had that been true and had the more than $1 billion in aid that the U.S. government has since given to Rwanda been used to build democratic institutions, Victoire Ingabire would have been a candidate in last year’s presidential election and would quite likely be Rwanda’s president now, not a maximum security prisoner.

Within weeks of returning to Rwanda, Mrs. Ingabire was summoned to the Criminal Investigation Department, then summoned again and again, until she was finally arrested on April 21, 2010. The arrest happened less than two weeks after Gen. Kagame publicly insulted her in a genocide memorial address, referring to her as a “hooligan” and one of these “useless people who comes out of nowhere,” whom he would “cast off.”

At the time of the arrest, the Rwandan chief prosecutor claimed that there was “overwhelming evidence” against her for “terrorism” and “divisionism,” evidence that they claimed had been obtained from foreign countries such as the United States and the Netherlands. This was back in April 2010. Shortly thereafter, she was released from jail and put under house arrest, forbidden to leave Kigali, to speak to the majority rural population, or to return home to visit her family in the Netherlands.

Thirteen hundred Rwandans and Congolese united to march through the streets of Paris in protest against the visit of Gen. Kagame on Sept. 14. Many held signs supporting Victoire Ingabire, their choice for president of Rwanda had she been allowed to run.
While she was under house arrest, the Rwandan government, which is not only heavily funded but also politically supported by the United States government, continued in its persecution of all its real political opponents. Opposition leaders and activists were jailed, Green Party Vice President Andre Rwisereka was beheaded, his body dumped by a river in Southern Rwanda, and another presidential candidate, Bernard Ntaganda, was imprisoned. Journalist Jean Leonard Rugembage was executed after writing that Kagame had ordered a political assassination attempt in South Africa, and other journalists fled the country.

On Aug. 9, 2010, Gen. Paul Kagame was then re-elected president with an implausible 93 percent of the vote.

Fast-forward to October 2010 and the United Nations’ release of an investigative report accusing Kagame’s army of having massacred Hutu refugees – “children, women, elderly people and the sick” – in Rwanda’s neighbor, the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The report said that, if proven before a competent court, these massacres could be classified as crimes of genocide, the very crime that has blessed Gen. Kagame and his government with so much victim’s privilege, most of all in Congo.

Within two weeks of the U.N. release of the report, Kagame’s government moved Mrs. Ingabire from house arrest in her home, under surveillance, to Kigali’s 1930 maximum security prison. Five days earlier, she had told KPFA Radio that the U.N. should expand the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal on Rwanda (ICTR) to include the Rwandan Army’s crimes in Congo, documented in the U.N. report. She had been told, upon her release to her home in April, that she was not to speak to the press, but she had continued to do so and no doubt would have been called for more interviews about the U.N. report.

Neither Gen. Kagame nor his army have been called to answer to the charges of genocide in Congo, but Mrs. Ingabire has now been languishing in jail, often denied visitors, held on suspicion of terrorism and “genocide ideology,” for nearly a year.

When Mrs. Ingabire’s trial got underway this September, the Rwandan prosecutor tried to delay the case by claiming that they are still waiting for the evidence to come in from abroad. This is the evidence that they claimed they already had back in April 2010. When the delay was not granted, the Rwandan prosecutor was forced to start producing “evidence” in the kangaroo court that would be laughable in any self-respecting democracy. An example was the video shown as evidence of her “terrorism” and “divisionism.”

In the video, all that Mrs. Ingabire says is as follows:

Victoire Ingabire, the Rwandan leader who might well have defeated Paul Kagame in last year’s presidential election, is instead on trial for suggesting that all Rwandans, not only Tutsis, were victims of genocide. She consults with her attorneys, Ian Edwards, left, and Gatera Gashebana, who are defending her against charges that could keep her in prison for decades. – Photo: Alice Muhirwa
“I would like to say that today, I came back to my country after 16 years, and there was a tragedy that took place in this country. We know very well that there was a genocide, extermination. Therefore, I could not have returned after 16 years to the same country after such actions took place. They took place when I was not in the country. I could not have fallen asleep without first passing by the place where those actions took place. I had to see the place. I had to visit the place.

“The flowers I brought with me are a sign of remembrance from the members of my party FDU and its executive committee. They gave me a message to pass by here and tell Rwandans that what we wish for is for us to work together, to make sure that such a tragedy will never take place again. That is one of the reasons why the FDU Party made a decision to return to the country peacefully, without resorting to violence. Some think that the solution to Rwanda’s problems is to resort to armed struggle. We do not believe that shedding blood resolves problems. When you shed blood, the blood comes back to haunt you.

“Therefore, we in FDU wish that all we Rwandans can work together, join our different ideas so that the tragedy that befell our nation will never happen again. It is clear that the path of reconciliation has a long way to go. It has a long way to go because if you look at the number of people who died in this country, it is not something that you can get over quickly. But then again, if you look around you realize that there is no real political policy to help Rwandans achieve reconciliation. For example, if we look at this memorial, it only stops at people who died during the Tutsi genocide. It does not look at the other side – at the Hutus who died during the genocide. Hutus who lost their people are also sad and they think about their lost ones and wonder, ‘When will our dead ones be remembered?’

“For us to reach reconciliation, we need to empathize with everyone’s sadness. It is necessary that for the Tutsis who were killed, those Hutus who killed them understand that they need to be punished for it. It is also necessary that for the Hutus who were killed, those people who killed them understand that they need to be punished for it too. Furthermore, it is important that all of us, Rwandans from different ethnic groups, understand that we need to unite, respect each other and build our country in peace.

“It is important that all of us, Rwandans from different ethnic groups, understand that we need to unite, respect each other and build our country in peace.” – Victoire Ingabire

“What brought us back to the country is for us to start that path of reconciliation together and find a way to stop injustices so that all of us Rwandans can live together with basic freedoms in our country.” – English translation by Aimable Mugara of the video of Victoire Ingabire speaking at the Gisosi Genocide Memorial Centre in Rwanda, Jan. 16, 2010. The video was presented as evidence in the Kigali courtroom where she is on trial for terrorism and “genocide ideology” during the second week of September 2011.

If the Rwandan chief prosecutor thinks that the above words make one a “terrorist” and a “divisionist,” then how many of us would be locked up in Rwanda, quite possibly for 30 years or life, as Ingabire is likely to be? Few of us can be as eloquent and inspiring as Victoire Ingabire, but who would not want peace, justice and the end of ethnic strife in Rwanda? Who would not want all Rwandans to be able to mourn those they lost in the Rwanda Genocide, at the genocide memorials and during each year’s genocide commemorations?

Do Americans, whose taxpayer dollars are contributing to the Rwandan chief prosecutor’s salary, really want to see Victoire Ingabire and all she stands for behind bars for 30 years to life?

A Rwandan now based in Toronto, Aimable Mugara said in a previous story in the Bay View that Rwandans, both Hutus and Tutsis, “want to live together in a democratic society where every single article in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights applies to every Rwandan citizen.” Visit his website, www.rwandahumanrights.org, and contact him at amugara@trentu.ca.

 

3 thoughts on “Do American taxpayers really want to pay Rwanda to keep Victoire Ingabire behind bars?

  1. Jean Pierre Papin

    Mr. Mugara, do you really think that US$ 1 billion in 10yrs is something that will make Rwandans bend over backward. My friend, Rwandans through various home-grown initiates (ie: one dollar campaign, performance contracts, umuganda, direct foreign investments through PPP, etc) are building their own country without pinning their hopes on pathetic and patronizing aid. For this reason, it baffles my mind how the peterborough-based Trent university that currently employs you can have confidence in your deficient ideas. Piece of advice, though, try to approach and talk to any anthropologist, you and your so-called “hero” Victoire Ingabire will learn that the very meaning of an ethnic group (or ethnicity) is “a group of people whose members identify with each other, through a common heritage, often consisting of a common language, a common culture (often including a shared religion)”. As far as i know, all Rwandans DO share a common language, a common culture, and did hold similar religious practices before the advent of colonialists. Therefore, i don’t know what you and Ingabire mean by “RWANDANS FROM DIFFERENT ETHNIC GROUPS”. Either you’re ignorant of this historical fact or your intent is to mislead your readers. In any case, this article points to some sort of nostalgia on your part to see Rwanda return to the pre-1994 darkness where its people were pitted against each other to serve the interests of its earlier post-colonial leaders who were nothing more than servants of former colonial powers. ALUTA CONTINUA!!

    Reply
  2. Jean Pierre Papin

    Ann, are you trying to silence me by erasing my comments.
    Wow, you're doing exactly what you always accuse Kagame of (ie: censorship).
    Am i getting under your skin?
    Oh, i'm sorry babe, don't cry, i won't do that again.
    Wait a minute, on a second thought, i change my mind.
    You know what, if you can't handle my critical views of you, then you shouldn't accuse Kagame, either?
    Your hypocrisy is what makes you not credible.
    ALUTA CONTINUA!!

    Reply
    1. therisingcontinent

      @Jean Pierre Papin. If what I can see reproduced here is from you, I cannot imagine any worse you can accuse Ann of about her being a hypocric. I hope now her publishing your comment here can give her more credit than to Kagame in his censorship of free speech.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

BayView Classifieds - ads, opportunities, announcements
San Francisco Comcast
Advertisement