Support SF BayView
Donate or Subscribe to SF Bay View
Follow Us Twitter Facebook

What is happening in Venezuela?

March 12, 2014

by Miguel Tinker Salas

On Feb. 12, Venezuelan Youth Day and the commemoration of the independence battle of La Victoria, some university students and traditional conservative opposition groups took to the streets in Venezuela. In Caracas, students and others attacked a government building, burned cars and damaged the entrance to a metro station. The demonstrations extended for several days, as it quickly became obvious that the principal purpose of the protests was to destabilize the government and seek the ouster of the democratically elected president of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro.

Maduro faced a hotly contested presidential election shortly after the death of Hugo Chávez, in which he narrowly defeated Henrique Capriles. To gain support, Capriles promised to continue social programs initiated by the late president, becoming what some called a “Chávez lite” candidate. The hard line elements of the opposition, including Capriles, refused to accept the results of the elections and street violence generated by conservative forces left close to a dozen people dead.

Venezuela pro-gov peace march by elders Simon Bolivar T-shirt 022314 by Rodrigo Abd, AP
A man wearing a T-shirt of Venezuela’s independence hero Simon Bolivar chants pro-government slogans during a march by elderly people in Caracas, Venezuela, on Sunday, Feb. 23 to Miraflores presidential palace, where the seniors met with President Nicolás Maduro. – Photo: Rodrigo Abd, AP
Last December, Venezuela held municipal elections that the opposition purposely turned into a referendum on the Maduro presidency. Despite the opposition’s winning of several important areas in Caracas and the city of Maracaibo the government sponsored coalition, Polo Patriotico, won over 70 percent of the country’s municipalities. The election results revealed that the opposition had not won over the majority despite the country’s serious economic problems and the loss of the charismatic Hugo Chávez as leader of the left.

Coming on the heels of a recent electoral defeat, the protest by the opposition in early February caught many by surprise. Even though Venezuela has held 19 elections since 1998, with the left winning 18, there are actually no elections scheduled during 2014, a rarity in the country’s active electoral cycle. The earliest elections are scheduled for December 2015, when voters will go to the polls to elect members of the National Assembly. The presidential recall provision of the Constitution cannot be triggered until 2016.

It quickly became obvious that segments of the radical right wing were not willing to wait for the democratic process to unfold. The opposition feared that the government might have time to address the very real problems that Venezuela faces, including food shortages, inflation that has reached over 56 percent and crime that takes a toll on all sectors of society. Therefore it should not come as a surprise that when Leopoldo López, the political figure who hoped to capitalize on the protest and replace Capriles as the de facto leader of the opposition, was asked how long the protest should last, he responded, “Hasta que se vaya,” until Maduro leaves.

This is not the first time the opposition has resorted to extra-parliamentary means to oust a sitting president in Venezuela. Previously, the opposition staged a coup in 2002 and, when that failed, the upper echelon of the oil company led a strike in 2002-2003 that paralyzed the nation. Subsequently, the right engaged in efforts at destabilization known as the guarimba in the early part of 2004 that also failed. In essence, the opposition has once again adopted the all or nothing strategy they embraced in 2002 and 2004: Either Maduro resigns or they will continue to protest.

Who are the students?

It is also misleading to assume that all students in Venezuela support the opposition; in fact, many also support the government and its allies. Moreover, student leadership of opposition activities is not new in Venezuela. In 2006, after suffering a series of electoral defeats, students, especially from private universities, became the new face of the opposition. Students were also the leading force protesting the non-renewal of the broadcast license of RCTV, a leading television company, for its involvement in the 2002 coup.

The social character of university students in Venezuela has changed significantly since the 1960s and 1970s. The application of neoliberal policy to the educational arena, the continued use of standardized entrance exams and the expansion of private universities transformed the social character of students and a greater percentage are now from the middle and upper classes.

The application of neoliberal policy to the educational arena, the continued use of standardized entrance exams and the expansion of private universities transformed the social character of students and a greater percentage are now from the middle and upper classes.

A tale of two cities and two countries

Much of the reporting by the mass media gives the impression that Venezuela faces a national rebellion. The reality is that the protests have been restricted to certain pockets in the country, mostly middle and upper middle class neighborhoods, not entire cities.

Most damage to private property and infrastructure has occurred in these neighborhoods. According to the government, 18 municipalities have been the center of protest out of 335. And even in municipalities where there are protesters, residents live a tale of two cities, with some areas besieged and others functioning under normal-like conditions. With the advent of Carnival, there are also contrasting images of people at the beach and others protesting behind barricades.


To create conditions of un-governability, the so-called “democratic opposition” had taken to barricading the roads to prevent the free movement of people and precipitate a crisis. They have set up barricades using boulders, glass, trees, trash filled bags, and anything else at their disposal.

In other cases they are throwing glass and nails – called miguelitos, nails thrust through pieces of garden hose – onto the road to impede traffic. The police and the National Guard have cleaned city streets on numerous occasions. However, protestors hide materials and take over the streets again once the Guard departs.

Walking around areas controlled by the opposition, it is impossible not to notice that many streets have been covered with car oil to make the surfaces slick causing motorbikes to skid out of control. The opposition assumes that motorizados, those on motorcycles, are government supporters. There has not only been a demonization of the motorizados, but also a racialization of individuals who purchased cheap Chinese motorcycles since most are from lower socioeconomic sectors and tend to be people of color.

It is also impossible not to notice the steel wire and barbed wire strung across the roadways, and some motorcycle drivers have either been injured or killed by these barriers. Edwin Duran, 29, in Caracas was killed by steel wire placed on the street to frustrate traffic. Delia Elena Lobo, a 39-year-old mother, was also killed as she rode on a motorbike with her son in city of Mérida.

The opposition assumes that motorizados, those on motorcycles, are government supporters. There has not only been a demonization of the motorizados, but also a racialization of individuals who purchased cheap Chinese motorcycles since most are from lower socioeconomic sectors and tend to be people of color.

A retired general, Ángel Vivas, tweeted several times giving instructions to his followers on how to place the steel wire on city streets. The government tried to arrest him for inciting violence. The general put on a bulletproof vest, armed himself with an M-16 and pistol and took to the rooftop of his house. The opposition blocked his house while some U.S. Spanish language media rushed to interview him, but they never asked how or why he was in possession of an M-16 assault rifle.

Venezuelan community Pie del Tiro confronts protestors

Fear is also being used to intimidate the population where barricades disrupt people’s lives. Residents are being told that the barricades are needed to protect the community from marauding bands of government supporters, the National Guard or the motorizados (motorcycle riders).

In some neighborhoods, they use the fear of being attacked by the Tupamaros, a political organization inspired by the Uruguayan group of the same name. In Venezuela, the Tupamaros are a leftist organization that has clashed with opposition forces in the past. Throughout the day, the rumor mill generates one potentially calamitous event after another.

The mainstream media is not reporting the dangerous conditions on the streets; in fact, many foreign reporters are afraid to leave the comfort and perceived protection of middle and upper middle class neighborhoods in which they reside. One U.S. journalist tweeted he had not ventured out of Altamira, a wealthy area of Caracas, and therefore could not report on conditions elsewhere.

Likewise, contrary to many reports in some media outlets, the military has not been unleashed to senselessly attack the protestors. Undoubtedly there have been incidents of violence and provocations on both sides, and the government recently ordered the arrest of several intelligence officers implicated in the two deaths, one in the opposition and one a Chavista activist.

Contrary to many reports in some media outlets, the military has not been unleashed to senselessly attack the protestors.

The number of killed has now reached double digits, but violence has taken its toll on both protestors and supporters of the government. While too high, the numbers would undoubtedly be much worse if the security forces were trying to suppress the protest with lethal force.

Why Táchira?

Protests in the western state of Táchira preceded the larger demonstrations in Caracas and elsewhere on Feb. 12 and were purportedly sparked by the attempted rape of a university student. The governor of the state of Táchira insists that no students came forth to file a complaint about the attempted rape.

Students took to the streets to protest the rising crime rate and the arrest of two protestors by the police is citied as a factor that enraged students. The protests in San Cristobal quickly spread to Mérida where the main campus of the University of the Andes (ULA) is located.

Venezuela anti-government demonstrator CaracasGÇÖ Altamira neighborhood 022114 by Rodrigo Abd, AP
An anti-government demonstrator in the rich Altamira neighborhood of Caracas, Venezuela, waves a flag but seeks a coup. – Photo: Rodrigo Abd, AP
However, like everything in Venezuela, developments in Táchira are more complicated than they initially appear. Some business sectors in Táchira profit tremendously from the illicit trade of subsidized Venezuelan goods sent to Colombia as contraband where they obtain much higher prices.

It is estimated that upwards of 30 percent of some Venezuelan basic food products exit the country as contraband. Shortages of basic food products have been especially evident in Táchira and Mérida, where many stores’ shelves are empty.

Average citizens also engage in the contraband trade to augment their salaries. Gasoline that in Venezuela is heavily subsidized, costing less than 10 cents a gallon, is also part of the contraband trade. The subsidy of gasoline, in place since the 1950s, costs the government upwards of $12 billion a year.

Táchira is the center of an active remittance trade between Colombians and Venezuelans, and money launderers exploit this exchange. Government efforts to control this illicit trade have generated displeasure among certain sectors.

Táchira also represents another challenge, the presence on Venezuelan soil of Colombian and Venezuelan paramilitaries that profit from the illicit trade and are linked to transnational criminal networks. They have already kidnaped one Venezuelan military officer who was visiting his family. They are an ever-present factor in the political protests in Táchira.

Gocho identity

A racialized “gocho” identity – Andean and predominantly whiter compared to Venezuela’s predominately mixed race and African heritage population – is also being promoted in the Andean states of Mérida and Táchira. Posters and banners proclaiming “gocho power” and their role in the protest have been common at rallies in Mérida and Táchira.

From 1898 through 1958, Venezuela was ruled by a series of Andean generals from the state of Táchira. This gocho identity harkens to a time when the Andes, and in particular Táchira and Mérida exercised a prominent role in the governance of Venezuela.

Protests centered in Táchira and Mérida raise the specter of a Bolivian Media Luna (half moon), where the conservative opposition, using a purported racialized identity, promoted the secession of the eastern provinces of Bolivia. Likewise some have suggested that Mérida, Táchira, Trujillo and Zulia might become a Venezuelan version of the Media Luna. However, protests in Zulia and Trujillo have not reached the levels of those in Mérida or Táchira and that scenario has failed to materialize.

A racialized “gocho” identity – Andean and predominantly whiter compared to Venezuela’s predominately mixed race and African heritage population – is also being promoted in the Andean states of Mérida and Táchira. Posters and banners proclaiming “gocho power.”

Another important feature of the opposition protest marches has been the leadership role of middle and upper class women. On Saturday, Feb. 22, women who support the government rallied in Caracas to promote peace and an end to the violence.

On Wednesday, Feb. 27, opposition women dressed in white staged protests against the government and rallied in front of the building of the Guardia Nacional in Caracas. A female officer of the guard came out to receive their demands and urged the protestors to take part in efforts at dialogue proposed by President Maduro.

At various opposition rallies, some women have taken to demanding a hyper-masculinity, baiting men to confront the Guardia or the police, and when they do not, raising questions about the men’s virility. Opposition social media is circulating the image of a young female protestor at one rally that attached a pair of “testicles” to her shorts and carried a sign that said, “Soy Gocha y tengo de sobra lo que algunos de ustedes les falta” (“I am a Gocha and I have in excess what you are all missing”). An arrow on the sign pointed to her purported “testicles.” Other signs at women’s protests state, “Women with ovaries vs. a symbolic military,” and others crudely state, “The men in Venezuela have no balls.”

Daily life

Where the opposition has set barricades, people live by the cell phone, texting each other to see if it is safe to get out and make a mad dash to whatever store may be open for a few hours. Most products can be found, though it may take multiple trips to various stores and the frustration of standing in long queues.

Rumors tend to dominate street conversations: Where is milk being sold, who has harina pan (corn flour used for making arepas, a national dish) and which roadblocks are passable? The opposition communicates mainly by social media, and many spend countless hours on Twitter, Whats-Apps, Facebook and Zello, an application that carries live conversations.

Venezuela pro-gov colectivo (collective) march downtown Caracas 022014 by Reuters
Not all students in Venezuela want to overthrow the government of Hugo Chavez successor President Maduro. These students are members of a pro-government "colectivo," or "collective," marching in downtown Caracas, Venezuela, on Feb. 20. – Photo: Reuters
In areas where protests are taking place, workers and other employees cannot enter and are losing income. Businesses, merchants and the tourism industry on the eve of Carnival also suffer the consequences of the blockades. Public transportation is at a standstill in these areas and “moto taxis” have become the primary form of transportation.

Although most business sectors support the opposition, they are beginning to distance themselves from the more violent protests. Some appear to recognize that the mobilizations will not topple the government. On Wednesday, Feb. 26, the leaders of Fedecamaras (Chamber of Commerce), Fedeindustria (Chamber of Industry) and Eugenio Mendoza, the CEO of the country’s leading food company, attended the government sponsored “Peace Conference.”

Although they criticized the government on many fronts, they also expressed opposition to the blockades and acknowledged the legitimacy of the Maduro government. Though the hierarchy of the Venezuelan Catholic Church was invited, they opted not to attend. The papal nuncio did attend and urged dialogue and negotiations to end the violence. The political leaders of the opposition MUD (Unity Table) coalition also boycotted the event.

There is, however, evidence that some elected opposition political leaders are starting to distance themselves from the street violence as well. This is because people are tired of the disruptions in their lives. The opposition mayors of Baruta, Sucre and El Hatillo – all part of greater Caracas – have called for an end to violence and disavowed the street protests that create siege-like conditions.

Fighting for political leadership of the right

Capriles appears desperate to reassert his leadership of the opposition coalition, particularly since López outflanked him, becoming the most recognized leader of the right. However, López is not widely trusted by many sectors of the opposition, including some students. Capriles spoke at one opposition demonstration indicating his willingness to take part in a dialogue.

Venzuela anti-gov students string barbed wire across streets to behead motorcyclists, motorizados 0214 by Raul Arboleda,
Barbed wire strung across roadways is Venezuelan anti-government students’ way of targeting the poor, who are assumed to be supporters of President Maduro and who typically ride motorcycles, demonizing them as motorizados. Santiago Enrique Pedroza, 29, a delivery driver who didn’t see the wire after dark, was beheaded by it. – Photo: Raul Arboleda, AFP
Maduro convened a meeting of governors that Capriles, the governor of the state of Miranda, should have attended; however, pressured by the far right wing, he refused to attend. Previously, he had attended a meeting and shook Maduro’s hand, for which he was roundly criticized by the right wing.

Two other opposition governors showed up and openly sparred with Maduro. Capriles’ absence as well as other opposition voices was a mistake and a lost opportunity to dialogue and attempt to diffuse the violence the country faces.

Overtaken by the protests, Capriles initially asserted that political extremes sought violence, a reference to both the right and the left. He has even publicly criticized López and national assembly member María Corina Machado for raising false expectations that the protests would unseat Maduro. However, he will find it difficult to cast himself as the moderate in the current fracas.

Capriles faces a scenario similar to the Republicans in the U.S. as they confront the Tea Party wing of the party. To remain the leader of the opposition, Capriles has to appeal to the more radical right wing that refuses to negotiate with the government under any conditions.

However, to win elections, he has to gain the support of disgruntled Chavistas and poorer sectors. As opposition to the disruptions caused by protests increases, Capriles will find it harder and harder to portray himself as a moderate.


Venezuela is not facing a Ukraine-like crisis as some in the opposition have suggested. The president retains support throughout the country. Neither is it on the verge of a fratricidal conflict similar to what has taken place in Syria.

A large part, but apparently not a majority of the society remains bitterly alienated from the government. Undoubtedly, Venezuela faces real economic and social problems. However, opposition efforts to topple the government will only exacerbate these problems and continue to raise tensions in the country.

Venezuela anti-gov protesters destroy mural wall for rocks to throw 0214 by Rodrigo Abd, AP
Student protesters destroy a mural-painted wall for rocks to throw at police. – Photo: CNN
On the international front, countries like Brazil and Argentina have called for no foreign intervention in Venezuela, an allusion to United States support of the opposition. Despite recent tensions, and the mutual expulsion of diplomats, the Maduro government recently extended an olive branch by naming a new Venezuelan ambassador to Washington.

The countries have not formally had ambassadors since 2008. The U.S. has not formally responded to the gesture. The U.S., however, has expressed concern over a potential new immigrant wave from the Caribbean if Venezuela curtails or ceases the sale of oil through Petro-Caribe to the countries of the region.

There is no evidence that broad sectors of society, especially the urban poor who provide the most support to the government, have joined the protests initiated by middle and upper class sectors. This division led one Colombian commentator to state, “Venezuela is an odd country, the only place where the rich protest and the poor celebrate.”

It is doubtful the opposition can sustain the present level of protests. By seeking Maduro’s ouster through undemocratic means and without majority support, the opposition has once again entered a “callejon sin salida,” a political dead end.

The U.S. has expressed concern over a potential new immigrant wave from the Caribbean if Venezuela curtails or ceases the sale of oil through Petro-Caribe to the countries of the region.

After the debacle of the 2002-03 oil strike that cost the country over $14 billion in lost revenue, they saved face by calling for Chávez’ recall. Under the present electoral calendar they have no such option.

There is no evidence that broad sectors of society, especially the urban poor who provide the most support to the government, have joined the protests initiated by middle and upper class sectors. This division led one Colombian commentator to state, “Venezuela is an odd country, the only place where the rich protest and the poor celebrate.”

The opposition will find it difficult to save face after this round of protests, and many question their commitment to democratic principles and their ability to unite all of Venezuela. Having radicalized their base, they now face the daunting task of demobilizing their followers if they are to salvage any credibility in future elections.

Miguel Tinker Salas is professor of Latin American history at Pomona College and author of several books on Venezuela, including “The Enduring Legacy: Oil, Culture, and Society in Venezuela” (Duke University Press). He can be reached at or through his website, at

The Venezuela threat is the threat of a good example

A bill before the U.S. Senate “urges the president to immediately impose targeted sanctions, including visa bans and asset freezes, against individuals planning, facilitating or perpetrating gross human rights violations against peaceful demonstrators, journalists and other members of civil society in Venezuela.”

Pierre Labossiere speaks SF Venezuela solidarity rally 021714 by Jonathan Nack
Pierre Labossiere of the Haiti Action Committee expresses solidarity with the Venezuelan government at the Bay Area rally on Feb. 17. – Photo: Jonathan Nack
On March 5, the U.S. House passed a nearly unanimous resolution sponsored by ultra-right Republican Ileana Ros-Lethinen condemning “inexcusable violence perpetrated against opposition leaders and protesters in Venezuela” and calling for governments and organizations in the region to stand in solidarity with protestors. The Congressional Progressive Caucus members voted in favor of the resolution, which had only one no vote.

Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, citing a high-level State Department official, said that President Obama “is looking at” sanctions.

Solidarity activists must respond quickly to reverse the disinformation that is causing even our expected Congressional allies to go along with the right wing and U.S. government “regime change” strategy in Venezuela. The situation is more dangerous than it has been for years, and we must immediately let our elected representatives know that we oppose U.S. intervention and will be watching them closely.

Please send the following message to your senators and representative, or modify it in your own words. Be sure to include the excellent article by Dr. Miguel Tinker Salas as an antidote to the corporate press disinformation.

And don’t stop there. Continue to call and write your elected representatives with factual information to combat this intense campaign of disinformation. Reliable sources are the Center for Economic Policy Research,, and Venezuelanalysis,

Contact your elected officials today! Tell them, “Hands off Venezuela!”

Sample letter to your elected representatives

Dear Representative,

I am alarmed at the level of disinformation about the current situation in Venezuela and particularly upset by the passage in the House of a resolution (H.Res.488), sponsored by Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, filled with disinformation, and a Senate bill (S.Res.365), sponsored by Mark Rubio and Bill Nelson calling on the Obama Administration to issue sanctions against the democratically elected government of Venezuela. Please read the attached article by noted Venezuela scholar Dr. Miguel Tinker Salas published by Center for Economic Policy Research for a factual analysis of the true situation in Venezuela. The issue of US intervention in the sovereign affairs of Venezuela is an issue of critical importance to me. I will be closely monitoring your votes on issues related to Venezuela.


(Your name)

U.S. officials, social groups and academics support the government of President Maduro

American progressives, represented by intellectuals, organizations, social groups, community leaders and even mayors, have expressed unqualified support for the constitutionality of President Nicolás Maduro and have rejected the violent events perpetuated by the Venezuelan fascist right.

President Maduro, Danny Glover solidarity w Venezuela 031114
On March 11, Danny Glover meets with his friend, President Maduro, to deliver a statement of solidarity from leading American progressives.
The embassy of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela has created a special section on its website where more than 30 articles, press releases and expressions of solidarity with the Venezuelan president and his people can be found. Highlighted among them are well known personalities such as Professor George Ciccariello-Maher, Kevin Edmonds, Danny Glover, Tom Hayden, Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, Mark Weisbrot, Lisa Sullivan and organizations such as the Alliance for Global Justice, the National Lawyers Guild (NLG ) and others.

Through the use of neo-fascist groups planning to undermine the integrity and stability of the country, in Venezuela violence has been brewing against the revolutionary government in order to break down constitutional order; they have tried to destabilize and play out the scenario used on April 11, 2002, to foment a coup d’etat.

President Nicolás Maduro has made countless calls for calm and has even convened working groups to lead the way to a state of peace. However, the right-wing opposition continues boycotting the rule of law in Venezuela.

For example, on March 3, in the southwestern Venezuelan Andean state of Táchira, as part of the call made by President Nicolás Maduro the government inaugurated the first Regional Conference for Peace with all sectors of the country’s national dialogue.

On Feb. 28, representatives of private sector companies recognized the will of the Executive Branch to consolidate the conversations in the economic sphere and reaffirmed their commitment to the dialogue initiated by the national government.

On Feb. 27, the president called on the Venezuelan people to practice peace and nonviolence as ways for Venezuelan society to come together and develop. “This is the way. There is no other way,” said Maduro, who invited all sectors of the country to “complete a cycle of building a stage of peace and coexistence.”

San Francisco solidarity with Venezuela Feb. 17, 2014



Filed Under: Haiti and Latin America

2 thoughts on “What is happening in Venezuela?

  1. Mary Vivian

    This article is wholly erroneous. The author has naively bought into Maduro ‘s propaganda.
    The people of Venezuela are beyond caring about politics or opposition candidates. They want only their rights to a democratic life restored; for the ability to work and buy life’s necessities without waiting in long lines; for a stop to societal violence where 90% of murders go unpunished; to travel without fear. In short, they want the restoration of their right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and the ouster of Cuban nationals who have colored the last 15 years of Chavista rule.

  2. Olga Ramirez

    This article is so wrong it's no funny. The author doesn't have any idea about the situation in Venezuela. It's not true that in the last 15 years of this horrible gobermment things are better for the poor. The poor still poor, the rich are richer, the government is a new class of rich. They have become horrendously rich and the one suffering is the middle class which is shrinking . Their salary doesn't cover basic needs, there is not hope for the students to find decent jobs when they graduate. Crime is rampage, there is not food. Go there, try to have a life as a middle class person and you will see how difficult life can be. I am not talking about high middle class I am taking about hard working people.


Leave a Reply

BayView Classifieds - ads, opportunities, announcements