Support SF BayView
Donate or Subscribe to SF Bay View
Follow Us Twitter Facebook

Jury denies damages to father of Oscar Grant

July 3, 2014

by Nick Chiles

Oscar Grant III hugs his daughter Tatiana in this 2007 photo.

Oscar Grant III hugs his daughter Tatiana in this 2007 photo.

The father of Oscar Grant III, whose shocking death at the hands of a transit police officer was memorialized in the award-winning film “Fruitvale Station” (and in intense protests and rebellions that resulted in his killer, Johannes Mehserle, becoming the first police officer in the history of California to be convicted and sentenced and serve time for an on-duty shooting – ed.) was denied damages yesterday by a federal jury. The jury found that the father – who had been in prison all of his son’s life – failed to show he had a close familial relationship with his son and failed to prove the officer intentionally harmed his son for reasons “unrelated to legitimate law-enforcement objectives.”

The 22-year-old Grant III was killed by a single shot to the back from BART Officer Johannes Mehserle early in the morning on New Year’s Day 2009 in Oakland. The incident was captured on cellphone video by other passengers, prompting protests and riots and outraging much of the nation.

Oscar Grant Jr., right, plays with his only child, Oscar Grant III, during a visit by baby Oscar’s mother, Wanda Johnson, and her daughter, Chantay.

Oscar Grant Jr., right, plays with his only child, Oscar Grant III, during a visit by baby Oscar’s mother, Wanda Johnson, and her daughter, Chantay.

In January 2010, BART came to a $1.5 million settlement with the mother of Grant III’s young daughter, Tatiana, and a $1.3 million settlement with his mother, Wanda Johnson. BART also awarded $175,000 to each of Grant III’s five friends who were with Grant when he was shot.

Mehserle was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in a 2010 criminal trial, and was released from a Los Angeles County jail in June 2011 after receiving credit for time served.

When he testified in Oscar Grant Jr.’s civil trial on June 11, 2014, Mehserle, 33, cried in open court as he described shooting Grant III as he lay face down on the train platform. Mehserle claims he mistakenly used his service revolver when he wanted to grab a Taser.

“The man was killed in cold blood: No ifs, ands or buts about it,” Grant Jr. said during his testimony, according to the Oakland Tribune. “I don’t care how they say it; it was not an accident.

“They took the most precious thing in the world to me – my only child,” said Grant Jr., 50.

The jury was aware that Grant Jr. is serving time in Solano state prison but was not told any details of his criminal record – nor the details of Grant III’s own arrests and convictions before his death.

As described by the Tribune story, the spectators in the courtroom could hear Grant Jr.’s leg shackles as he walked to and from the witness stand dressed in a gray suit, blue shirt and multicolored tie. The father showed the jury a photo of himself dressed in prison blues and holding baby Oscar at the Old Folsom Prison as he talked about a long and close relationship with his son facilitated through prison visits, letters and phone calls.

Wanda Johnson responds angrily to the verdict of involuntary manslaughter, crying out again and again to the press, “My son was murdered!” Inadequate as it was, the Mehserle verdict was the first time a law enforcement officer in California was convicted for an on-duty shooting. – Photo: KTVU

Wanda Johnson responds angrily to the verdict of involuntary manslaughter, crying out again and again to the press, “My son was murdered!” Inadequate as it was, the Mehserle verdict was the first time a law enforcement officer in California was convicted for an on-duty shooting. – Photo: KTVU

Grant Jr. told the jury he filed the lawsuit out of respect for his son. He said he wants to help take care of his granddaughter Tatiana and he wants the chance to pay restitution for his own crimes.

“I’ve already paid for my crime; I’d like to give back to the community,” said Grant Jr., who according to a trial brief filed by his lawyer expects to be paroled in the next couple years after four prior denials by the state parole board.

But when Mehserle’s attorney, Mike Rains, who also defended Mehserle in the 2010 criminal trial, questioned Grant Jr. about the depth of his relationship with his son, the father grew combative, according to the Tribune. Rains asked if he knew the names of the schools Grant III attended, whether he played high school sports, knew his daughter’s birthday, his friend’s names, or whether he had a job or a cell phone.

As Oscar’s mother decried the verdict outside the courthouse in Los Angeles, where Mehserle was tried, Oakland streets erupted once again on verdict day, July 8, 2010. – Photo: Indybay

As Oscar’s mother decried the verdict outside the courthouse in Los Angeles, where Mehserle was tried, Oakland streets erupted once again on verdict day, July 8, 2010. – Photo: Indybay

Grant Jr. could not answer many of the questions.

Rains was also quick to point out some of the answers that differed from those Grant Jr. gave during a 2010 deposition.

Rains asked him if he was so eager to get out of prison to be with his son, why did he keep getting in trouble in prison over the years for offenses such as drug possession?

“What does my prison record have to do with your officer killing my son, shooting my son in the back?” Grant Jr. responded angrily.

Grant Jr. said Grant III last visited him in prison in 2002, and he last spoke to his son three days before his Jan. 1, 2009, death.

“I told him, ‘If you decide you wanna drink, don’t drive your car. Catch the bus or ride the BART,’” Grant Jr. said.

Johannes Mehserle, Oscar Grant

Johannes Mehserle, Oscar Grant

The jury deliberated a day before choosing to deny Grant Jr.’s claim that Mehserle’s intentional shooting of his son deprived him of a previous existing relationship that involved deep attachments and commitments to one another and the sharing of special community of thoughts, experiences and beliefs.

“Five years later, the wounds are still there – I’m relieved that we can finally put this tragedy behind us, not just for Johannes and his family, but for the entire community,” Mehserle’s attorney Rains said in a statement.

Nick Chiles, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and New York Times bestselling author, is senior editor at Atlanta Black Star, where this story first appeared. He has written or co-written 12 books and won over a dozen major journalism awards during a journalism career that brought him to the Dallas Morning News, the Star-Ledger of New Jersey and New York Newsday, in addition to serving as editor-in-chief of Odyssey Couleur travel magazine. He can be reached at Info@atlantablackstar.com.

Note: To share your condolences, write to Oscar Grant Jr., D-33091, CSP Solano 22-194L, P.O. Box 4000, Vacaville CA 95696.

 

One thought on “Jury denies damages to father of Oscar Grant

  1. Malaika H Kambon

    Today, on your “4th of the lie,” it should not be news that a federal jury in a courtroom in the U.S. would deny the special relationship that exists between an AFRIKAN father and his sun, regardless as to the geographic location of either.

    The tragedy is that the father and sun were already separated for an extended period of time – in this particular instance, all of the sun’s life – no doubt by a jury with the same kind of mind set as the jury in this instance: that AFRIKAN familial bonds do not matter.

    This has been a constant since the beginning of AFRIKAN enslavement: the temerity of an oppressor to tell the entire world for 6 centuries that the fore mothers and fore fathers of humanity matter not, except as property and profit.

    They placed no value on the sun nor the father’s love that sheltered him so they locked up one and killed the other.

    Despite what one might think or believe about the progressions of these two lives in the world, the basic remains: the same system treated the relationship between father and sun as worthless and as insignificant. And the father, enslaved is of more value to this same system, incarcerated (enslaved) as he is.

    So – one is dead. Ergo – no more progeny (read: no more potential rebellions against enslavement)

    And – one is enslaved. Ergo – more profit in the coffers of the prison industrial complex, no more progeny (read: no more potential rebellions against enslavement)

    In their eyesight, property rights have been re-established, the case is closed, and Willie Lynch dances w/ glee from the grave.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

BayView Classifieds - ads, opportunities, announcements
San Francisco Comcast
Advertisement