donate or subscribe
Follow Us Twitter Facebook

Kagame’s newspaper calls on the ICC to indict the BBC for ‘genocide denial’

October 19, 2014

by Ann Garrison

KPFA Weekend News broadcast Oct. 18, 2014

Rwandan President Paul Kagame’s newspaper, The New Times of Rwanda, has called on the International Criminal Court (ICC) to indict the BBC for “genocide denial” because of its documentary, “Rwanda: The Untold Story.”

Transcript

International criminal defense attorney Peter Erlinder – in handcuffs for “genocide denial” – appears in a Kigali, Rwanda, courtroom with Kenyan lawyer Kennedy Ogetto in May 2010.

International criminal defense attorney Peter Erlinder – in handcuffs for “genocide denial” – appears in a Kigali, Rwanda, courtroom with Kenyan lawyer Kennedy Ogetto in May 2010.

KPFA Evening News Anchor Cameron Jones: The BBC documentary, “Rwanda: The Untold Story,” has become the subject of fierce argument including many open letters to the BBC both applauding and attacking it. Paul Kagame accused the BBC of “genocide denial” and his state newspaper, The New Times, even called on the International Criminal Court to indict the network and/or its producers.

KPFA’s Ann Garrison spoke to international criminal defense attorney Peter Erlinder, who was arrested for “genocide denial” and thrown in a Rwandan prison in 2010, until an international campaign for his release prevailed.

KPFA/Ann Garrison: Peter Erlinder, “genocide denial” sounds like a pretty bad crime, just as any crime including the word “genocide” does. Could you explain what it means in this context?

Peter Erlinder: Well, in the context of Rwanda, “genocide denial” is questioning the version of events that is told by the Rwandan government, and the current Rwandan government (leaders) were the victors in a four year civil war, so that any description of the four year civil war that differs from the Rwandan government’s description is called genocide denial.

William Mitchell Law Professor Peter Erlinder

William Mitchell Law Professor Peter Erlinder

And the BBC’s description of what happened during the four years of the Rwandan Civil War and the 20 years after, which include 5 million or more deaths in the Congo and in Rwanda, is called genocide denial by the Rwandan government.

KPFA: Genocide denial is outside the mandate of the International Criminal Court, isn’t it? They’re mandated to prosecute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity?

Peter Erlinder: Yeah, the mandate of the International Criminal Court is to punish actions, not to punish thoughts. And genocide denial, of course, is a thought crime. And the question of what genocide denial actually is is one that is very difficult to sort out because it depends on one’s view of history, and in this case it’s the victors in the war, in the Rwandan war, that are deciding what the genocide was and how it took place.

Victoire Ingabire, despite being in handcuffs for “genocide denial,” gives a thumbs up to her supporters outside a Rwandan courtroom on April 17, 2012.

Victoire Ingabire, despite being in handcuffs for “genocide denial,” gives a thumbs up to her supporters outside a Rwandan courtroom on April 17, 2012.

Certainly there was mass violence, but the way the mass violence took place was different than the way that it’s described by those who won the war. And Robert McNamara, the United States’ secretary of state, in a documentary called “The Fog of War,” made that point very clear, saying that leaders of the United States would have been the war criminals had the Japanese won World War II.

KPFA: Doesn’t President Kagame’s newspaper seem a bit confused about the balance of institutional force in suggesting that the ICC should indict the BBC?

Peter Erlinder: Well, it seems to me that it’s consistent with the policy of President Kagame and the RPF (Rwandan Patriotic Front) government, which is to mount the maximum political attack against anyone who disagrees with Mr. Kagame. Political opponents like Victoire Ingabire, who attempted to run against him in the election in 2010. Victoire Ingabire is in prison now for at least 15 years.

There’s a long list of opponents who have been assassinated or forced into exile, and the idea that opponents of Mr. Kagame’s view of history, or of politics, pay a high price is now being felt by the BBC. And to suggest that an august journalistic institution like the BBC is engaged in “genocide denial” is almost laughable.

KPFA: And that was international criminal defense attorney Peter Erlinder on The New Times of Rwanda’s call for the ICC to indict the BBC for “genocide denial.”

For Pacifica, KPFA and AfrobeatRadio, I’m Ann Garrison.

Oakland writer Ann Garrison contributes to the San Francisco Bay View, Counterpunch, Global Research, Colored Opinions, Black Agenda Report and Black Star News and produces radio news and features for Pacifica’s WBAI-NYC, KPFA-Berkeley and her own YouTube Channel. She can be reached at anniegarrison@gmail.com. If you want to see Ann Garrison’s independent reporting continue, please contribute on her website, anngarrison.com.

8 thoughts on “Kagame’s newspaper calls on the ICC to indict the BBC for ‘genocide denial’

  1. jean marie

    Ann you hate kagame, but what i am sure of, you will die before he does. good luck spreading the hate about rwanda. You support every thug that wants to bring blood shed in rwanda. Tusti, hutu died in genocide, no doubt about it and my their souls rest in peace. Live us that are surviving to leave in peace. Mind your own business. I believe you have personal issues that you could address like having a family, and you health since you are agging to first. Thank you

    Reply
      1. kweli

        Ann Around the world people can’t say anything about jewish holocaust. If you saying anything aganist it you are a nazi and will face consequence. You know why people have respected holocaust. It’s because the Jewish people are powerful and they run the world. So for poor countries like rwanda people can deny that Genocide never happened and that’s ok. We lost hutus and tutsi in the genocide and may their soul rest in peace. ratios for who died don’t matter no one deserved to die. But the killing was intended for tutsi. Hutus happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. You can believe these former RPF who have made their careers on shading blood, they speak from both sides of their mouth.

        Reply
      2. kweli

        As for the Extremist hutus living with you in the USA and europe, no surprise that they are not happy they didn’t kill all the Tutsi. That was mission impossible and it will always be. God gives life and he can only take it way. As for your issues, your country has alot of problems, you could start by helping the HOmesless in san francisco, if you are trying to do something good. Leave us alone. Why do westerns always think they know what is best for africans and yet the can’t deal with their own problems?????
        STOP THE HATE, DON’T WORRY ABOUT BBC LOOKING FOR RATING ON THE EXPENSE OF OUR DEAD LOVED ONES, UNDER THE PRETENSE OF INVESTIGATIONAL REPORTING.

        Reply

Leave a Reply

BayView Classifieds - ads, opportunities, announcements