donate or subscribe
Follow Us Twitter Facebook

Support AB 1506 to repeal the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act and return real rent control to California 

February 25, 2017

by Lynda Carson

This decades-old newspaper shows the jubilation in Santa Monica over passage of local rent control, which is needed now more than ever there, as well as in the Bay Area. Two of the sponsors of AB 1506, Assemblymember Richard Bloom and state Sen. Ben Allen, are Democrats from Santa Monica. They expect stiff opposition from landlords.

Oakland – Repealing the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act by passing Assembly Bill 1506 would go a long way toward strengthening rent control, limiting rent increases and once again allowing cities to regulate the rental rates on rental housing units that have been voluntarily vacated. Passage of AB 1506 would help in the effort to stabilize communities and challenge price gouging by unscrupulous landlords throughout California.

California Assemblymembers Bloom, Chiu and Bonta introduced AB 1506 on Feb. 17, 2017, and need your support for the proposed bill to repeal Costa-Hawkins. The bill would once again allow the regulation of residential rental housing pricing by local governments in California.

Passage of AB 1506 would help in the effort to stabilize communities and challenge price gouging by unscrupulous landlords throughout California.

According to the city attorney of Fremont, “As early as 1976, the California Supreme Court upheld the authority of cities to adopt rent control under their police power granted in the state Constitution.

“That authority was limited by the state Legislature in 1995 by the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act (Costa-Hawkins). Under Costa-Hawkins, rent control cannot be applied to units built after Feb. 1, 1995. Costa-Hawkins also exempts single family homes, condominiums and rental properties with less than two units.

“As to rental units constructed prior to 1995, Costa-Hawkins prohibits “vacancy control.” In other words, where a rent control ordinance is in place, rent-controlled units by law become temporarily uncontrolled when a tenant moves out, and property owners can reset and increase rents at that time without any limitations.

“Once a new tenant occupies the vacant unit, however, the unit again becomes subject to an existing rent control ordinance.”

Assemblymember Rob Bonta of Oakland is trying to repeal the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act. In an email, his aide, Tonya Love, wrote to tenants’ rights groups supportive of AB 1506:

“I am writing to bring your attention to AB 1506 – Repeal Costa-Hawkins – that Assemblymember Bonta is co-authoring with Assemblymember Bloom and Assemblymember Chiu. Our office is working to gather support for this bill and naturally we wanted to reach out to see if this is an issue your organization can consider supporting.

“The bill is pretty straightforward as it repeals the Costa-Hawkins law. A strategic communications and advocacy plan is in the works. However, we are asking all of our local advocates and their partners to help by sending in letters of support, making phone calls, writing op-eds, setting up meetings with key assemblymembers and mobilizing constituents in support of AB 1506. This will be a heavy lift and we need all hands on deck!

“Currently the bill has gone through its first reading (introduced Feb. 17) and we expect it to be assigned to the Housing and Community Development Committee within the next couple of weeks. We will keep you informed of when it reaches the committee.

“There are seven members, and we need a majority to pass. I have highlighted in all-caps the members whose votes are critical in order to get the bill passed out of committee. If you have allies in these districts, please communicate with them and ask them to support AB 1506.”

“Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee Members:

  • David Chiu (chair) – D, San Francisco
  • Marc Steinorth (vice chair) – R, Rancho Cucamonga
  • Raul Bocanegra – R, San Fernando
  • ED CHAU – D, MONTERY PARK
  • Steven Choi – R, Tustin
  • ASH KALRA – D, SAN JOSE
  • MONIQUE LIMON – D, SANTA BARBARA

“If you need contact information or have any questions, please let me know. Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you.” – Tonya D. Love, Office of Assemblymember Rob Bonta, 1515 Clay St., Ste. 2204, Oakland, CA 94612

California Apartment Association (CAA) opposes the repeal of Costa-Hawkins 

It is no surprise that the California Apartment Association (CAA) is against the repeal of Costa-Hawkins and is aggressively taking action to stop it. The CAA has many politicians in its pocket as a direct result of the corrupting influence its BIG MONEY has on lawmakers in California.

Greg McConnell of The McConnell Group in Oakland, who resides in Danville, likes to boast that he is the one who led the charge to pass the notorious the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act – a law that stripped cities of their right to regulate rents as a way to protect renters from unscrupulous landlords.

Lynda Carson may be reached at tenantsrule@yahoo.com

12 thoughts on “Support AB 1506 to repeal the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act and return real rent control to California 

  1. mzw

    Regulate rent only? How about also regulate gas price, insurance and grocery too?
    I know that some officers regulate their salary increase too.
    Look at SF, Berkeley, Oakland, the regulated cities, I hate to be there.

    Reply
    1. Sandra Tarbet

      Great idea. Regulate and governate over all.
      And sell your extra property, no incentive to offer it as rentals.

      Reply
  2. booboo

    at mzw, well said. regulate also how many children one can have so housing shortage is not an issue. or an regulate the number of tenant advocacy groups as well.

    Reply
  3. jose flores

    I hope Mayor of San Francisco Edwin Lee could tell the public that in San Francisco which Chinese politician does not have gangland background but still can keep a foothold in San Francisco's political stage, includes himself. How did he get on the stage? What is the relationship between him and the gangland that is almost everyone know it in San Francisco Chinatown.

    Reply
  4. Sandra Davenport

    Wow. Let's never ever buy in California and rent out our properties. There is no incentive to provide rental housing to others. We will just sell our property and not rent. Ridiculous. Can you please regulate my groceries too? food is too expensive. Regulate it all.

    Reply
  5. Alvin M.

    AB 1506 is a very bad idea.

    Most SFH owners are not evil landlords trying to gouge poor tenants. They are small investors trying to have some extra retirement income while providing a valuable service to the society. Calling them "unscrupulous landlords" is disingenuous, shameful, and plainly disgusting.

    Besides, this heavy-handed regulation without any thought on economic implications is brainless.

    Reply
  6. Frances

    As a landlord, if this passes and the price is right, will likely sell the house. The new buyer will likely be moving in for self use since no incentive to rent out the house so one less house for rent in the market.

    Reply
  7. Forest

    Stupid is as stupid does! Let these entitled people who think housing should be subsidized repeal this. At the end it will only hurt them when rental inventory goes down. Limited supply and increasing demand will only drive prices up. Instead of constantly bashing those awful greedy landlords who provide you with a place to call home without saving up a hefty down payment, why not push our legislators to give developers incentives to build more affordable units or drive those high tech good-paying jobs out of the SF Bay Area? Again, stupid is stupid does so be careful what you wish for.

    Reply
  8. victim

    Rental control is just a worse petition ever since to take control of rental price.due to the payment on insurance .property tax .utilities bills to pay for at the high cost ,dose any one think of this issue can be fixed by landlord? if I have house located in the city of rental control that cost me much more than I can receive the rent from tenant ,Why I have to rent it for a little money and take big risk? I would rather not rent it instead of picking the bad BUGS to live in my house not to pay for rent and damage the house… what so ever….

    Reply

Leave a Reply

BayView Classifieds - ads, opportunities, announcements



Click and find the
TravelVisaPro.com