by Jovanka Beckles
Richmond, Calif. – At its last meeting of 2013, by a vote of 4-2, the Richmond City Council moved further along on its plans to stabilize our neighborhoods by restructuring the mortgages of underwater homeowners. Under the plan, mortgages would be reduced to a reasonable level that reflects their current value, which will give underwater homeowners some equity in the home and mortgage payments they can pay. By preventing these underwater homeowners from losing their homes to the mortgage holders, we avoid the blight and crime that come with foreclosed homes.
Under the plan, the city will offer to buy the mortgages of underwater home owners from the current mortgage holders by negotiating a price that reflects the current value of the mortgage. If the mortgage holders – banks, other financial institutions – refuse to negotiate a reasonable value, the city will have the right to use eminent domain to obtain the mortgage at a fair value.
Actually it is more like “reverse” eminent domain. For years eminent domain has been used by developers to force people out of their houses. Richmond is proposing to use eminent domain to keep people in their homes.
At the Dec. 17 City Council meeting, a resolution passed creating guidelines to assure that the plan would help those people hurt most by the foreclosure crisis by making the hardest hit areas the priority and by putting a cap on the mortgage size. Under these guidelines most of the houses helped will be in areas where families make less than $55,000 annual income.
For years eminent domain has been used by developers to force people out of their houses. Richmond is proposing to use eminent domain to keep people in their homes.
This program is really a win-win solution for communities. It allows people to stay in their homes. It stabilizes the community. It even stabilizes “toxic mortgages” for investors. Yet big money is flowing into Richmond to fight this community supported program.
There are many good realtors who provide a service matching people with homes that are available. But there are many other realtors who have no problem disrupting the stability of the community. They make their profit when there are sales. For them, foreclosures are forced sales. The realtor associations who have mounted a campaign of lies and fear against Richmond are giving all realtors a bad name.
Another interested party opposing Richmond CARES is land speculators. These individuals are nothing more than profiteers who could be compared to carpetbaggers and who make financial gains from blighted communities.
They buy (now cheap) blighted, stripped homes and then cash in on the gentrification which is spreading as middle class and working class people are being driven out of San Francisco and into Richmond and other parts of the East Bay. Finally, there are the rightwing ideologues who oppose any community-led action to save communities for the residents.
Fortunately, as the word gets out, interest in the program is spreading. The more cities that are willing to join the fight, the stronger we can be against the banks and realtors. A majority of San Francisco Supervisors have written a letter stating that they are looking into the plan. Other Bay Area cities are expressing interest.
Richmond is hoping to go forward in coalition with other cities because we understand that we are stronger with others. Practically speaking, a coalition will allow us to share legal and management costs.
The community organization ACCE that is leading the campaign for the program in Richmond is beginning similar campaigns in other cities in California. In San Francisco (see http://www.homedefendersleague.org) I encourage all homeowners and renters alike to be well informed by investigating and critically analyzing the situation in order to make the best decisions going forward.
Jovanka Beckles is a Richmond city councilmember who also works full time as a mental health specialist for Contra Costa County. She was born in Panama City, where she grew up in a bilingual, multicultural household. Her parents moved to the United States in1972, and she has lived in Richmond for the last 13 years. She can be reached at Jovankabeckles@gmail.com.
Richmond battles banksters to save homeowners from foreclosure
by Jonathan Nack
The City of Richmond, California, voted to continue its groundbreaking effort to save resident homeowners from foreclosure on Dec. 17, 2013. The Richmond City Council voted 4 to 2 in favor of moving forward with its plan to use its right of eminent domain to protect homeowners and to “prioritize those neighborhoods that have been particularly hard hit by the housing crisis.”
The San Francisco Chronicle reported that Richmond could invoke eminent domain for underwater mortgages by uniting with another city in a Joint Powers Authority – even without getting a super-majority of the City Council to approve the controversial idea. More than half of homeowner mortgages in Richmond are said to be underwater.
Opponents of the plan seek to block its implementation by relying on the city’s charter, which requires a super-majority to invoke eminent domain. But Richmond could invoke eminent domain for underwater mortgages by uniting with another city in a Joint Powers Authority – even without getting a super-majority of the City Council.
Opponents of the plan seek to block its implementation by relying on the city’s charter, which requires a super-majority to invoke eminent domain. The council is currently divided, with four members supporting Mayor Gayle McLaughlin’s plan and three opposing, which is short of a super-majority.
Banks and realtors oppose the concept, saying it is unconstitutional and would drive up lending costs in the city. They’ve run a well-financed campaign attacking the plan and are poised to launch a fierce court battle against it, according to the Chronicle.
The Contra Costa Times reported that the resolution adopted directs city staff to step up efforts to partner with other cities in a possible Joint Powers Authority.
“To keep my support, we need to ensure we have partner” cities, Councilman Jael Myrick said. “Other cities cheerleading Richmond is fine, but let’s be honest here. Richmond needs other cities to reduce the risk,” he told the Contra Costa Times.
Prior to the Dec. 17 council meeting, supporters of Richmond’s initiative rallied in from of Richmond City Hall. Later, at the City Council meeting, a majority of approximately 40 speakers spoke in favor of moving forward.
For more information:
- Richmond’s controversial housing plan takes step forward, Richmond Confidential
- Richmond City Council votes for foreclosure prevention plan, ABC 7 News
- Northern California city takes step toward adopting eminent domain to halt foreclosures, Association Press
Jonathan Nack, an Oakland-based journalist and activist, can be reached at email@example.com.