Hot spots: Radioactive San Francisco

by Michael Steinberg

Treasure Island

On Nov. 13 the San Francisco Chronicle ran a lead story written by the S.F.-based Center for Investigative Reporting. The story was about the radioactive contamination of Treasure Island, a former U.S. Navy base in the middle of the Bay.

SF-skyline-from-Treasure-Island-radioactive-cleanup-site-1113-by-Michael-Short-Bay-Citizen, Hot spots: Radioactive San Francisco, Local News & Views This story is important in and of itself but also because it once again unearths the region’s role in the birth of the atomic age and also highlights the radioactive legacy that continues to haunt us.

The Chronicle article reported that 575 metal discs consisting of radioactive radium-226 had been found in the ground at Treasure Island as of 2011. The report did not mention that the radioactive life of radium-226 is millennia, over 16,000 years.

The Navy has claimed that all its radioactive waste on the island had already been hauled away. In August 2012, RT News, a Russian English language news service, reported, “Navy contractors excavated and removed 16,000 yards of contaminated dirt, some with levels of radiation up to 400 times above the Environmental Protection Agency’s limit for human exposure.”

And in September 2012 the East Bay Express reported, “Over the past five years, at least three shipments of extremely dangerous radioactive contamination – most of it from these metal disks – have been moved from Treasure Island to secure locations.”

This radwaste was so hot that proximity to it for a few hours could kill you in a month.

But where are these “secure” locations, and who’s going to keep an eye on it for the next 16,000 years? And what effect has it had on the health of the mostly low income tenants who have been living in former Navy housing on Treasure Island?

Or the people who use its recreational facilities, such as Little League fields? The Center for Investigative Reporting article reported:

“Every weekend, families from around the region flock to the baseball fields along Treasure Island’s eastern side for Little League games. Outfielder Cole Scott, 13, said fly balls have often sailed into fenced areas posted with radiation warning signs. And he said people just as often climbed over the fence to fetch them.”

The Chronicle did not include the above passage in its Nov. 13 top story.

Where are these “secure” locations, and who’s going to keep an eye on it for the next 16,000 years? And what effect has it had on the health of the mostly low income tenants who have been living in former Navy housing on Treasure Island?

So, where did all this hot stuff come from?

In October 2010, provided the following information from a 2006 Navy report, “Treasure Island Historical Radiological Assessment” [That report is no longer online. The Navy’s Aug. 6, 2012, “Draft Historical Radiological Assessment Supplemental Technical Memorandum” updates it. – ed.]:

The Navy operated a training center on Treasure Island for the study of nuclear warfare and decontamination from the late 1940s up into the 1990s. “Part of the training involved the hiding of radioactive buttons around the training school, and then students armed with Geiger counters would try to find them.” Maybe the emphasis here should be on “try”?

Aerial-view-Treasure-Island-082786-by-Deanne-Fitzmaurice-SF-Chron, Hot spots: Radioactive San Francisco, Local News & Views One school document listed “Radionuclides of Concern.” This included cesium-137, radium-226, thorium-232, strontium-90 and plutonium 239. All of these are potentially lethal, with long radioactive lives. They would be expected to appear after a nuclear weapon detonation, which the students were training to deal with. “[A]ll made an appearance at one time or another on the Treasure Island base,” Cal Watch member Anthony Pignataro reported.

In April 2013, Bay Citizen, a publication of the Center for Investigative Reporting, broke the news that it had found cesium-137 (radioactive life 300 years) on Treasure Island. Two of its reporters had taken soil samples from the site and sent them to two independent testing labs. Both labs found C-137 in the soil.

Bay Citizen also reported on the findings of an August 2012 Navy study of radwaste on Treasure Island. Among these was that for the “first time the Navy has fully acknowledged that the island, created from landfill in 1937, was used as a repair and salvage operation for a Pacific fleet exposed to atomic blasts during the Cold War.”

The most common way to decontaminate the nuked ships back then was to sandblast them, creating more radioactive waste in so doing.

And so there are multiple ways Treasure Island could have become a nuclear hotspot.

On Nov. 27, 2013, two weeks after the Chronicle story, KTVU Channel 2 reported that low income residents of 24 units on Treasure Island, some of whom had lived there for more than a decade, had received a letter from San Francisco officials informing them that they would have to move soon.

The city plans to have luxury highrise housing built on Treasure Island. Only the continuing contamination and the remaining low income tenants are standing in the way.

With soaring evictions in San Francisco another hot topic, the timing couldn’t have been worse. The letter, dated Nov. 25, was from Richard Beck, boss of the Treasure Island Development Authority.

Beck said their homes were contaminated, but that the eviction action was “not related to an ongoing radiological survey.” Supposedly the tenants could move to other housing units on the island.

Becker claimed that six units, said to be contaminated with arsenic, “may have to be demolished.”

The city plans to have luxury highrise housing built on Treasure Island. Only the continuing contamination and the remaining low income tenants are standing in the way.

Hunters Point

Hunters-Point-Shipyard-Radiologically-Controlled-Area-sign-web, Hot spots: Radioactive San Francisco, Local News & Views Disturbing as Treasure Island’s radioactive history is, that of Hunters Point Naval Shipyard appears to be even more sordid. To begin with, it was the transit departure point for Little Boy, the atomic bomb the U.S. dropped over the civilian population of Hiroshima in August 1945, murdering hundreds of thousands of civilians.

A review of the events leading up to that action seems to be in order here. Since Japan had bombed Pearl Harbor in late 1941, the military forces of the two nations had fought a furious and increasingly degenerate war.

The U.S. knew that Germany was trying to build an atomic bomb too, and the race was on.

By June 1945 the fighting was over in Europe, with the Allies victorious. But the war was still raging in the Pacific, though the U.S. had the upper hand. It wanted to get it over with ASAP. In March 1945, U.S. B29 bombers firebombed Japanese cities. They dropped hundreds of thousands of napalm bombs on Tokyo.

But even after horrendous conflagrations and major loss of life, Japan would not surrender.

In mid-July, the Navy ship Indianapolis, which had just been repaired at Mare Island naval base in Vallejo, Calif., received orders to report to Hunters Point to pick up “special cargo.”

The following account by a naval officer from July 1945 appeared in the SF Bay View newspaper on Aug. 31, 2009:

Hunters-Point-Shipyard-sandblasting-radioactive-ship-courtesy-TimePix-2, Hot spots: Radioactive San Francisco, Local News & Views “On July 15th we were ordered to go to San Francisco (Hunters Point) to take on some cargo. … We tied up there and two big trucks came alongside. The big crate on one truck was put in the port hangar. … [T]wo army officers [from the other truck] … carried a canister about 3 foot by 4 foot tall … Later on, I found out that this held the nuclear ingredients for the bomb and the large box in the hanger contained the device for firing the bomb. …

“We sailed 0800 the morning of 16th July. We arrived in Tinian [near Guam Island in the Pacific, from which the B-29 carrying the A-bomb flew off] the morning of 26 July and unloaded the material and bomb which was later to be dropped over Hiroshima.”

Also on July 16, the U.S. set off the first atomic bomb ever in Alamogordo, New Mexico.

But that was just the beginning of Hunters Point’s involvement with nuclear operations.

Hunters Point began operating as a Navy shipyard in the early 1940s. It soon became the only Navy shipyard in Northern California that could deal with large warships.

After World War II ended, the U.S. wasted no time in continuing nuclear operations. In July 1946, during Operation Crossroads, it set off two A-bombs at the Bikini Atoll in the Pacific. Nearly 100 “target” and 150 “support ships” sat in surrounding waters.

The Navy wanted to see how the ships would do in an atomic blast.

There were animals on some of the ships, ranging from goats to rats. The Navy wanted to know how they would do too.

As it turned out, neither did so well. A lot of the animals died, and a lot of the ships, those that didn’t sink, ended up contaminated with radioactive fallout from the two atomic blasts.

The Navy did what it could to decontaminate them, but its efforts “revealed conclusively that removal of radioactive contamination of the type encountered on target ships cannot be accomplished successfully,” a Navy fact sheet on Operation Crossroads stated.

Hunters-Point-Shipyard-Clean-Contaminated-courtesy-TimePix, Hot spots: Radioactive San Francisco, Local News & Views As for the support ships, the fact sheet goes on, they “were decontaminated as necessary and received a radiological clearance before they could rejoin the fleet. This required a great deal of experimentation, primarily in San Francisco.”

And primarily at Hunters Point.

Community Window on the Hunters Point Shipyard reported “18 target and observation vessels were decontaminated at Hunters Point” after Operation Crossroads and that subsequently at the shipyard “the decontamination of ships associated with Pacific atomic and thermonuclear (H Bomb) weapons testing generated radiological material and waste.”

Hunters Point was also the home of the Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory. This facility’s “purposes included radiological decontamination of ships exposed to atomic weapons testing,” and also “included conducting research and experiments on decontamination, the effects of radiation on living organisms, and the effects of radiation on materials,” the Navy reported, from post WWII until 1969. It became the “U.S. military’s largest facility for nuclear research,” according to the Sept. 1, 2001, SF Weekly.

And, the Weekly reported, the “shipyard also consolidated radioactive waste from other facilities, including the University of California, Mare Island and McClellan Air Force Base (near Sacramento).”

As a result of all these activities, substantial amounts of radioactive and other toxic wastes have been found at Hunters Point since its closure in the late ‘60s.

Subsequently the EPA found “various radionuclides, primarily radium-226 and cesium-137” there.

The EPA declared Hunters Point a Superfund site. How well it’s been cleaned up is still a matter of controversy, similar to that at Treasure Island. And, as with Treasure Island, at stake is a high end housing development that could destroy surrounding primarily low income African American communities.


USS-Independence-burning-Bikini-Able-nuclear-bomb-test-070146-later-sunk-Farallon-Islands-Nuclear-Waste-Site-after-5, Hot spots: Radioactive San Francisco, Local News & Views Some radioactive wastes were created or received at Hunters Point, while others ended up in the ground, air and water.

Still others were transported off site. Beneath the waters adjacent to the Farallon Islands, 30 miles off San Francisco, sits the Farallon Islands Nuclear Waste Site, the largest U.S. undersea radwaste dump.

From 1946 until 1970 the Navy loaded an estimated 45,000 55-gallon drums of radioactive waste onto barges at Hunters Point, then dumped them in the vicinity of the Farallones. If the barrels didn’t immediately sink, sailors shot at them until they did.

Several sources report that the U.S. Navy ship Independence was deep sixed somewhere in the region as well. The Independence was one of the Navy war ships exposed to nuclear fallout in a U.S. Pacific test of an atomic bomb.

The ship was brought back to Hunters Point, where it was determined that it was too radioactive to salvage. According to the September 2001 SF Weekly report, the Independence was “packed with huge amounts of radioactive waste before it was sunk, very probably in the Farallones.”

Farallon-Islands-by-Wikimedia-Commons, Hot spots: Radioactive San Francisco, Local News & Views The Navy’s official line is that the 45,000 barrels it sunk contained relatively low levels of radiation that would be harmless to living things by now. But the SF Weekly article reported, “Two government officials say the Navy has acknowledged dumping thousands of barrels of high level, long lived ‘special’ nuclear waste at the site.”

This reportedly included large amounts of uranium and plutonium.

The Farallon Islands are adjacent to the Monterey Marine Sanctuary, which includes much of the coastal waters of Northern and Central California.

And they are smack dab in the middle of the 1,282-square-mile Gulf of Farallones Marine Sanctuary.

Half lives

While it is true that the shorter lived radioactive wastes at Treasure Island, Hunters Point and the sea floor beneath the Farallon Islands have decayed away by now, that of the longer lived dangerous ones, like radium-226, cesium-137, plutonium and uranium will be around for hundreds of more years, if not millennia. Plutonium-239 has a radioactive life of 240,000 years.

And so too will the threat of cancer and other serious diseases to living things they come in contact with, as well as the potential to cause genetic damage to future generations.

When there is money to be made off of the sites, some of the radwastes may be hauled away or covered over. The Navy is supposed to be responsible for this, but it doesn’t want to spend the money to do a complete job – if there is such a thing – despite an annual U.S. military budget of over $700 billion.

And there don’t appear to be any accessible health studies of people in possibly affected communities.

Shipyard-fire-090900-by-Maurice-Campbell-web, Hot spots: Radioactive San Francisco, Local News & Views


After a fire at the Hunters Point Shipyard in August 2000, the EPA hired the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry to study what the fire might have done to residents of the surrounding Bayview Hunters Point community.

The agency reported that this was an “87 percent minority population” with “higher than the national average rates of asthma, respiratory disease, lung cancer and diabetes.”

The communities were “considered vulnerable and may be more sensitive to the effects of exposure to hazardous substances.”

And these substances at the former Hunters Point Shipyard included “radiological elements, PCBs, mercury, lead and over 400 toxins that emit very high readings and adversely impact all life forms, and that includes human life,” according to Francisco Da Costa, director of Environmental Justice Advocacy, in the April 7, 2010 edition of SF Bay View newspaper.

Hunters-Point-Shipyard-burned-area-capped-c.-2001-by-Maurice-Campbell, Hot spots: Radioactive San Francisco, Local News & Views


Yet the agency only recommended that the communities should be notified when toxins in the air were higher than usual, so they could leave their homes.

Once again, there don’t seem to be any definitive health studies, leaving residents on their own to deal with the diseases related to environmental racism, as well as social maladies like gentrification that seek to push them out of their neighborhoods altogether, dead or alive. And leaving the “better class” that is to replace that population around the toxic sites on their own as well.

Meanwhile the marine life beneath the Farallones is at the mercy of what’s in the 45,000 barrels of radwaste and scuttled A-bombed Navy ship as well. The marine sanctuaries that are supposed to help protect these living things are powerless to deal with this nuclear threat.

And so the atomic war that the U.S. started almost seven decades ago continues in San Francisco and off its shores, giving the lie to its market image as a green city and continuing to threaten the lives of the innocents and unborn, just as we did in Hiroshima.

All this points to the pressing need to denuclearize our city, our country and our world. The need to stop producing more radioactive wastes is paramount. Because at this point the question is: Will we outlive them, or will they outlast us?

All this points to the pressing need to denuclearize our city, our country and our world. The need to stop producing more radioactive wastes is paramount. Because at this point the question is: Will we outlive them, or will they outlast us?

Michael Steinberg, a veteran activist and writer based in San Francisco, can be reached at (415) 929-0671, or