Support SF BayView
Donate or Subscribe to SF Bay View
Follow Us Twitter Facebook

Why Bayview Hunters Point residents should support Prop B

November 1, 2010

by Jeff Adachi

I have worked as a public defender for over 22 years and have served as the city’s elected Public Defender for the past eight years. In my capacity as a public defender, I have represented many residents of the Bayview community and have been involved in the grassroots movement here to improve outcomes for children and young people through BMAGIC, a collaboration of community-based organizations. I have seen and witnessed the devastating impact of poverty and the failures of our institutions, particularly our schools, when it has come to serving the children of Bayview Hunters Point.

I have heard the promises made by politicians over the years to “fix” Bayview Hunters Point. While there have been short term fixes, there has been very little real change. The schools in this community still suffer from lack of funding and resources, the business corridor on Third Street still lacks the infrastructure to provide the community with sustainable long-term economic support, the employment promises to residents have only feebly been fulfilled and the criminal justice system still imprisons youth from District 10 at a rate nearly triple the rate of other parts of the city.

This endorsement appears at the top of the Prop B website,
While these social ills cannot be cured overnight, without coordinated and consistent efforts to solve these problems, little change will occur without the resources to make them happen. That is why we must reform government at its core and look at creating institutional change that will actually work to benefit residents.

An important first step in the effort to reform our government is Proposition B. What does city employee pension and benefits reform have to do with improving the quality of live for Bayview residents? Because unless we take steps to reign in our City’s escalating pension and benefits costs, we will see even more drastic cuts in programs that serve our most vulnerable residents, including children and seniors. But even more importantly, we must challenge the assumptions underlying the way things have been done and do things in a new way.

The criminal justice system still imprisons youth from District 10 at a rate nearly triple the rate of other parts of the city. An important first step in the effort to reform our government is Proposition B.

Our pension and benefits crisis, which costs residents nearly $1 billion a year, exemplifies the kind of problem that doesn’t get fixed because our elected representatives are more pre-occupied with being elected rather than doing what’s in the best interest of the people. This is why the supporters of Prop B had to rely on the initiative process to get on the November ballot. The 49,178 people who stepped forward to sign the petition want to make the changes to solve a problem that for years has been ignored. If B passes, this is change you can count on.

The idea that city employees should contribute toward their own guaranteed pensions and health care benefits shouldn’t be controversial. In these economic times, when unemployment is hitting into the double digits and many San Franciscans are losing their homes and jobs, paying towards the generous benefits that are funded by 94 percent of the working families who aren’t employed by the city should be a no-brainer.

So when you get a mailer that says that every elected official opposes Prop B, ask yourself why. Is it because elected officials don’t contribute a penny toward their pensions and benefits and want it to remain the same? Is it because city employees, who earn on average $93,000 a year in comparison to private sector employees who earn $46,000 a year, can’t afford it? Is it because city employees deserve to be treated differently than other working San Franciscans, who work just as hard and don’t have half the benefits afforded to city employees?

Former Mayor Willie L. Brown said it best: “This isn’t anti-labor. This is just an effort to get some intelligence into the pension system because we public officials have screwed up!” Mayor Brown understands the importance of this issue to the future – or lack of a future – of our City and providing basic services to our residents.

But the question Bayview residents should be asking themselves is what’s more important, pensions or schools? After-school programs for kids or pensions? Parks or pensions? Health services for seniors or pensions?

The question Bayview residents should be asking themselves is what’s more important, pensions or schools? After-school programs for kids or pensions? Parks or pensions? Health services for seniors or pensions?

While Prop B doesn’t solve all of our problems, or even address all of our city’s pension debt, it takes an important step forward by saving $120 million a year that can be redirected to the essential services that benefit all San Franciscans. And that’s why we have to act now, so we can live up to our hopes and dreams for our children, who are being unfairly burdened with our city’s unsustainable pension and benefits debt.

Please join me and the San Francisco Bay View newspaper, who endorsed Proposition B, in voting YES on Proposition B tomorrow, Election Day.

Jeff Adachi heads what is widely considered the most effective Public Defender’ Office in the country in defending the rights of people charged with a crime who can’t afford an attorney. Many Black people and other people of color in San Francisco owe him their freedom. Now he’s taken on some of the most powerful political forces in the city with Proposition B, and he’s doing it for the same people he defends in court – the people who are poorest and most oppressed. The SF Bay View salutes Jeff’s courage. We are very grateful and proud that he is fighting so hard for our people. Jeff Adachi, who wrote this commentary exclusively for the Bay View, can be reached at Learn more about Prop B at

8 thoughts on “Why Bayview Hunters Point residents should support Prop B

  1. Ann_Garrison

    This is one of those issues in which those who identify as San Francisco "progressives" seem split up the middle. I went back and forth but finally had to vote Yes on B.

  2. dante

    Most of city employees are non San francisco residents. most of them contribute nothing economically to San Francisco and its residents. It is time for them to pay part of their spouse and children medical expense. And re-allocate saving into schools and community development.

    1. Charles SainteClaire

      I don't live in SF. In fact I live in Southern California. I would imagine a lot of people who work in SF but don't live there buy lunch and shop there. And I imagine a lot of those who live in SF shop elsewhere often. Why do you think those who live outside San Francisco contribute nothing economically to the city?

  3. Honest Abe

    in exchange for continued PREVENTIVE health care provisions to children or other needy legal dependant of the hard working city employee, the wealthy authors along with greedy bankroller venture capitalist and billionaire backers of this divisive proposition have opted to use this “hidden” aspect of HEALTHCARE CUTS to boost their “savings” figure which they shamelessly tout knowing full well that such drastic cuts will not only displace the most vulnerable, namely children and retirees needing healthcare who cannot otherwise afford PREVENTIVE healthcare but to also undermine the overall universal healthcare concept, which most San Franciscans recognize as smart and cost effective.

    people, please see this for what it is and not for what it is not!  
    cuts to PREVENTIVE healthcare at minimal savings to the city fund will end up costing us tax payers double, triple and quadruple -when REACTIVE healthcare like urgent care and emergency room services at the medical industry’s skyrocketing rates and exorbitant costs and fees are factored in as the only remaining viable options for those no longer able to afford or qualify for any other type of reasonably priced medical coverage!  
    please vote NO on B.

  4. sfcitwho knowsu

    You are an as—- Jeff….its easy for you to say pay back or give back when you are filthy rich and living in St. Francis Woods…and don't forget your main backer..that other filthy rich guy who doesn't live in the city and expects to get something back from you in return for all the money he put into your bs prop b….i hope you fall flat on your face…..don't forget..not all of us were born with a silver spoon…or in your case a gold spoon in their mouths…..and your a liar.. you haven't been a public defender for 22 years..just the last 8..and you are milking the city for millions with your special interest.."attorneys" who get a blank check from your office each time they represent a client for the public defenders office…and don't forget about the over budget every year for the last 8…and what did you say to mayor when he asked for 10% back from all the upper management in the city to help balance the budget and the chief of police said hell no…. so lets get real……

  5. sfcit whoknowsu

    all that the money you say your going to save is going into your and the board of sups special projects bs programs……


Leave a Reply

BayView Classifieds - ads, opportunities, announcements