Support SF BayView
Donate or Subscribe to SF Bay View
Follow Us Twitter Facebook

Mumia Abu-Jamal’s 1982 death sentence is again declared unconstitutional

April 26, 2011

by Melquiades Gagarin, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund

Mumia Abu-Jamal, one of the world’s best known political prisoners, is feared by the powers that be for his revolutionary journalism – he was minister of information for the Philadelphia Black Panther Party at the age of 15 and in more recent years his commentaries have been broadcast by NPR (National Public Radio) and the Pacifica radio network and published widely, including by the Bay View – and for his millions of supporters around the world.
April 26 – The United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit has unanimously declared that Mumia Abu-Jamal’s death sentence is unconstitutional. In today’s decision, the Court of Appeals reaffirmed its 2008 finding that Mr. Abu-Jamal’s sentencing jury was misled about the process for considering evidence supporting a life sentence.

The court found that, in violation of the United States Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Mills v. Maryland, the jury was improperly led to believe that that it could only consider unanimously agreed upon evidence favoring a life verdict. This mistake rendered Mr. Abu-Jamal’s death sentence fundamentally unfair. The NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF), and Professor Judy Ritter of Widener Law School represent Mr. Abu-Jamal in this appeal of his 1982 conviction and death sentence for the murder of a police officer in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

“This decision marks an important step forward in the struggle to correct the mistakes of an unfortunate chapter in Pennsylvania history,” said John Payton, director-counsel of LDF. “Again acknowledging the existence of clear constitutional error in Mr. Abu-Jamal’s trial, the Court of Appeals’ decision enhances confidence in the criminal justice system and helps to relegate the kind of unfairness on which this death sentence rested to the distant past.”

Professor Ritter noted: “Pennsylvania long ago abandoned the confusing and misleading instructions and verdict slip that were relied on in Mr. Abu-Jamal’s trial in order to prevent unfair and unjust death sentences. Courts now use clear and unambiguous language to advise sentencing juries about their ability to consider evidence that favors a life verdict. Mr. Abu-Jamal is entitled to no less constitutional protection.”

Mumia Abu-Jamal has been on death row in Pennsylvania for 29 years.

Melquiades Gagarin of the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., can be reached at mgagarin@naacpldf.org or (212) 965-2783.

 

Tags

Filed Under: Uncategorized
Tags:

5 thoughts on “Mumia Abu-Jamal’s 1982 death sentence is again declared unconstitutional

  1. Marlon Crump

    Two weeks ago I made that prediction. Its an End of Age in terms of injustices in an unjust legal system!

    Reply
  2. Renaldo Ricketts

    Obama should pardon Mumia if he really has any balls,why not her is aman in prison for decades who's proclaimed his innosence. I cna just imagine the mental torture he's going through, am sure writing does release some stress but being behind bars for decades must ake it's toll on a person's psyche. I've read of people on death row who are on life support system, now does that make sense,hell no !
    I suppose the state wants the glory of killing you, death row must be the most vicious psychology torture ever imagined, every day is compartmentalized stress to the ultimate. Been in jail is mental structure and then you compound this with being on death row. Whew! No wonder so many lose their minds on death row, it's designed to break you, knowing any day you could be executed by the state. To all the people in jail the one million Black people,try to stay strong and hopefully you walk out that can of worms one day and start anew.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

BayView Classifieds - ads, opportunities, announcements
San Francisco Comcast
Advertisement