donate or subscribe
Follow Us Twitter Facebook

Hipsters de-Blacken Oakland, cause the encampments they abhor

October 13, 2017

This photo illustrates the SFGate (San Francisco Chronicle website) article cited here. The Chronicle’s caption: “A man who calls himself ‘Akie’ says the encampment at 29th Street underneath the freeway overpass should not be closed down because it provides a quiet and safe place for him to be.” – Photo: Devin Katayama, KQED

by Kheven LaGrone

A July 31, 2017, SFGate.com article titled, “Oakland residents say tent encampments threatening neighborhoods,” highlighted Ms. Hillary Nevis’s fight against the homeless. Ms. Nevis moved into her West Oakland home only about a year ago.

She had seen the homeless encampment near her new home grow and she claimed the citizens had gotten bolder and threatening. She complained to the city and about the city.

Homeless people live in fear of violence and dangerous conditions. Yet, the SFGate.com article never followed how Ms. Nevis’s actions added to the hurt of any individual already at the lowest point in his life.

Thus, the article privileged Ms. Nevis to appear blameless for the conditions of people living in the encampments. The article insulated her.

The SFGate.com article never followed how Ms. Nevis’s actions added to the hurt of any individual already at the lowest point in his life. Thus, the article privileged Ms. Nevis to appear blameless.

Ms. Nevis and other gentrifiers, the City and developers all share responsibility for gentrification – the process and system that created that encampment. For years, Oakland leaders wanted to make Oakland a hipster playground. They invested in making Oakland attractive to outsiders – gentrifiers. City planners courted the businesses and high-end condos that catered to them.

Making Oakland into a hipster playground meant whitening, or at least “de-blackening,” Oakland. This would be necessary to attract more white hipsters. They would even market the “new” Oakland.

In order to create the “new” Oakland, many native Oaklanders would have to be displaced. They knew this and often said about certain parts of Oakland that “They’re going to get those Black folks out of there because the white folks want it.”

When asked what her biggest challenge for marketing a “new” Oakland, then-mayor Jean Quan told the National Journal: “(M)y challenge is to let people know what the new Oakland looks like. Somebody just sent me an email saying, ‘Oh, you should have more black police, since more than 50 percent of your residents are black.’ And I’m like, ‘Actually, no, 28 percent of my residents are black, but we’re pretty evenly divided between blacks, whites, Latinos and Asians these days.’ But that’s their image of Oakland – and this is somebody who lives in the Bay Area.”

In order to encourage a visible white hipster presence in this “new” Oakland and attract more gentrifiers, the City allowed them to break safety laws. A white artist told the City Council that when he came to Oakland in 2005, he felt welcomed. He had fun ignoring Oakland’s laws against unlicensed parties and living in illegal warehouses.

In 2015, a party organizer even defied a policeman when caught breaking the law. However, the City treated those illegal parties as low-priority infractions. (See Mercury News, Sept. 18, 2017, “OPD: Officer’s 2015 report on illegal rave at Ghost Ship was ‘low priority.’”) Eventually 36 people were killed in one of those parties.

City leaders, developers, the media and politicians bragged about Oakland’s “new diversity” and “changing demographics.” But they didn’t ask where the poor and displaced Black Oaklanders had gone.

City leaders, developers, the media and politicians bragged about Oakland’s “new diversity” and “changing demographics.” But they didn’t ask where the poor and displaced Black Oaklanders had gone.

In fact, many Black Oaklanders would not find new housing easily. Landlords found ways to evict current Black tenants and get white tenants. Landlords with apartment vacancies openly discriminated against African American applicants. Thus, many displaced African American Oakland natives became homeless and some moved into the encampments.

While SFGate.com informed its readers of the struggles of Ms. Nevis, the article didn’t address how many of those people living in the encampments were displaced to make room for people like her. The article didn’t even mention that most of the people living in the encampments were displaced native African American Oaklanders. Thus, the article avoided burdening its readers with an example of institutional racism.

Today, in the “new” Oakland, we see “cool” new nightclubs across the street from encampments. The hip new people stand in line to get inside the club. They hang out in front of the club.

The article didn’t mention that most of the people living in the encampments were displaced native African American Oaklanders. Thus, the article avoided burdening its readers with an example of institutional racism.

The “hip” people seem not to care about the homeless people facing them – and whom they helped displace. Yet, the fact that the “hip” people are mainly white and the people in the encampment mainly Black reminds us that not everyone benefited equally from the “new” Oakland’s “new diversity.”

Now, investors are buying up SROs in downtown Oakland. They’re evicting the poor African-Americans. They will renovate the buildings for privileged newcomers.

When the renovation is completed, the investors will most likely not tell the newcomers that poor African Americans were displaced for their benefit. They will be privileged to enjoy the building with no blame or guilt.

According to SFGate.com, “Those with and without homes feel like the city hasn’t done nearly enough to solve the crisis.” It’s not just the City’s responsibility to help find homes for the homeless. Developers and landlords also helped create the encampment problem for the benefit of people like Ms. Nevis; they should help solve the problem too.

By helping the homeless, Ms. Nevis helps herself and her new community. Simply complaining to the city is not enough. Demanding that the City evict the homeless won’t work; the homeless have nowhere to go.

Ms. Nevis believes that “we’re not in this together.” That is not true. We, including Ms. Nevis, are in this system, this institution together. Ms. Nevis moved into a community with encampments; now she has to live with the reality – just like people in the encampment have to deal with their reality.

The media also has a role. They must remind the public that the homeless are full citizens; they are not vermin to be removed. The homeless are just as entitled to City protection as Ms. Nevis.

Ms. Nevis moved into a community with encampments; now she has to live with the reality – just like people in the encampment have to deal with their reality. The homeless are not vermin to be removed. They are just as entitled to City protection as Ms. Nevis.

The City must also defend its homeless citizens against being harassed, vilified and treated like vermin – just as the City would protect Ms. Nevis. Perhaps Ms. Nevis feels unsafe living near an encampment, but it is even less safe for the people living in the encampment.

More important, if we are to solve the problem, we must not be distracted from the real problem. The first step to solving a problem is to identify it. The problem with homeless people is not Ms. Nevis’s discomfort.

The problem is that people are homeless due to a system beyond their control and others are benefiting from it. And we must remember that the encampments are the results of bad city planning.

Kheven LaGrone, activist, writer, artist and curator of “Coloring Outside the Lines: Black Cartoonists as Social Commentators” and many other acclaimed exhibits, can be reached at kheven@aol.com.

 

12 thoughts on “Hipsters de-Blacken Oakland, cause the encampments they abhor

  1. el2dadough

    Amen to the truth! When Alameda sent its low-income residents, blacks and others, packing in the 1960's and 70's; they provided scant replacement shelter for these folks. Most moved to Oakland and beyond, while in the 1960's, the east Oakland flatlands were predominantly white. The mass black migration occurred when "Urban Renewal" policies led to the routine dismantling of low income housing in Oakland and Alameda. Oakland has recognized their responsibility to low income residents despite being swept up in the gentrification tsunami that obliterated poor people's access to their own city across the nation. Alameda, in stark contrast to Oakland's inadequate efforts to provide reasonable accommodation to its low income citizens, coldly and simply tore down all low-income housing and said, goodbye! I wonder how many of the Oakland homeless have roots from when Alameda, in an apartheid-like edict, forced the migration of many of it's own citizens?

    Reply
    1. Kheven

      Where are they going to go? If they had somewhere else to go, wouldn't they have gone there already? If the city cites them, how will they pay the citation?

      Reply
    1. kheven

      You're wrongly stereotyping and grouping displaced people as murderers. So we shouldn't care about people living in encampments?

      You believe their murderers, do you feel safer if the murderers are sleeping on the streets?

      Reply
  2. Woopwoop

    Oh your gonna blane ” white ” hipsters now. Get a grip asshole. We are all being squeezed. Just more divide and conquer rhetoric.

    Reply
  3. Kheven

    First, I like to call out the bullying name calling. It is an UNSUCCESSFUL attempt to shut down the discussion.

    "We are all being squeezed"? But are we all being squeezed equally? Aren't we seeing the benefits of privilege?

    You say it's "divide and conquer rhetoric." I say you don't want to hear me. We cannot be "united" if you choose not to hear me.

    Reply
  4. gee_regz

    It seems that all you see is race. You know what I see? I see people who want to live in a demanding market, with a drive to be successful in it. And no, you don't have to be a "white-hipster" to accomplish this. It's supply and demand. The job market all throughout the Bay Area (not just Oakland) demands for more jobs, so people are here to supply it, and you can be any race.

    Reply
    1. Kheven

      I saw the City and developers work to displace African Americans. This was done to accommodate new people–not help the existing citizens (who happened to be African American). I watched the City and developers create the "colorblind" utopia that you now see.

      If I wanted to believe in that colorblind utopia that you see today, I just have to deny what I had seen over the years. I might even tell someone who also saw that "It seems that all you see is race."

      Reply
  5. Hask

    All across Usa there are homeless encampments. We live inside the movie THE HUNGER GAMES society.
    Even with the majority of people born here suffering tremendously on the opposite spectrum the elite wealthy are spending on trifling trinkets with no concern for human beings around them. Wake up and face a revolution.
    Also look at India. The poor underclass and the wealthy. This is Usa today.

    Reply
  6. Hask

    Also while I get the white richer than people of color homeless divide; realize there are other influences at work. Such as incoming well educated foreign born people used to polluting the environment and getting ahead in life at all costs. At the rich private schools the Chinese wealthy are here in Usa training their new leaders of this land. We have lost the Republic and better learn to speak Mandarin. At least recognize what was the Usa is now a completly melted pot with no common language or culture. Is not any longer just white against people of color. Currently there is non native Usa born against all of we. Let that one sink in because they have no allegiance to you native born Usa people. To outsiders claiming this land native born are tools or trash.

    Reply
  7. lolnexus

    http://apkdownloads.net/lolnexus/
    It is a great article. You will surely like this also because it is a great stuff, yeah it’s give us lots of interest and pleasure I have enjoyed reading many of the articles and posts contained on the website, keep up the good work and hope to read some more interesting content in the future

    Reply

Leave a Reply

BayView Classifieds - ads, opportunities, announcements



Click and find the
TravelVisaPro.com