by Saeed Shabazz
New York (FinalCall.com) – Activists in New York City engaged in the free Mumia Abu-Jamal movement gathered for a meeting in Harlem on Oct. 23 to discuss the mobilization for the Philadelphia journalist on death row, convicted in 1982 of killing a police officer. Mr. Abu-Jamal has always stated that he was innocent.
“Resistance is growing – preparations are in progress,” Dr. Suzanne Ross, a clinical psychologist and co-chairperson of the Free Mumia/NY Coalition explained to The Final Call. Ms. Ross said she attended the emergency meeting at the Abiding Truth Ministries church in Philadelphia on Oct. 17, where plans were laid out for the upcoming campaign to get Mr. Abu-Jamal freed.
“The Philadelphia meeting was full of a high level of consciousness and energy – all focused on saving Mumia Abu-Jamal,” Dr. Ross said.
Rallies were held Oct. 24 in Philadelphia in front of the Fraternal Order of Police headquarters, a group that has been quite vocal concerning putting Abu-Jamal to death; another rally is set for Washington, D.C., on Nov. 12 in front of the Department of Justice. Letters and petitions calling on U.S. Attorney Eric Holder to open up a civil rights investigation concerning Mr. Abu-Jamal’s case will be delivered to the federal agency.
Attorney Roger Wareham of the Brooklyn-based December 12th Movement explained to The Final Call why he wrote the attorney general. “At this point it is a question of trying to find any avenue to save Mumia’s life and to win vindication for him, so that he may go free,” Mr. Wareham said.
“We have turned to the attorney general because we do not have faith that the decision from the U.S. Supreme Court will be favorable, even though there is enough undeniable proof that Mumia’s rights were violated during his trial,” Mr. Wareham said. The high court is reviewing a case that may decide Mr. Abu-Jamal’s case because some of the elements to be considered are similar.
Supporters have also started an online petition at FreeMumia.com that asks the attorney general to open a civil rights probe.
In July, the NAACP passed an emergency resolution during its 100th anniversary convention in New York City, asking Mr. Holder to conduct a civil rights investigation. “We had a meeting with the attorney general, and the subject of Mumia Abu-Jamal did surface. The attorney general said he was aware of the case and would look into it and get back to us,” Hilary Shelton, director of the NAACP’s Washington office and senior vice president for advocacy and policy told The Final Call.
Supporters for slain officer Daniel Faulkner hope the attorney general “won’t intercede.” State and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have said they haven’t found any wrongdoing in the handling of the Abu Jamal case in 1982, they argue.
Mr. Abu Jamal’s attorney Robert Bryan, appearing in The Netherlands for the Oct. 10 World Day Against the Death Penalty commemoration sponsored by Amnesty International, told the gathering: “Mumia is now a global symbol in the campaign against the death penalty. This is the most dangerous time for Mumia since his 1981 arrest.”
Mr. Bryan, a San Francisco-based death penalty attorney also explained that the U.S. Supreme Court would hear a case with similarities to his client’s case on Oct.13. He said that Smith v. Spisak may well determine if the court would re-instate Abu-Jamal’s death sentence. The attorney’s statements were e-mailed to journalists and supporters.
According to www.oyez.org/cases, a Web site that tracks U.S. Supreme Court cases, neo-Nazi Frank Spisak was convicted of murder and sentenced to death in Ohio. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld his contention that he received ineffective counsel and that at sentencing the jury instructions were unconstitutional, ignoring Ohio Supreme Court standards for prejudice.
In 2008, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Mr. Abu-Jamal’s death sentence should be overturned and he should serve life in prison without parole. The Supreme Court in April did not act on a petition filed by the Philadelphia district attorney Lynne Abraham demanding reinstatement of Mr. Abu-Jamal’s death sentence. Attorney Bryan had gone to Washington to argue that Mr. Abu-Jamal’s case was rampant with racism, starting with the fact that Blacks were excluded from the jury.
According to the Sheridan Texas Project in Austin, which advocates for a moratorium on executions, the Supreme Court may decide to sidestep Mr. Abu-Jamal’s prosecutor’s petition while hearing Smith v. Spisak; and if those prosecutors are successful in having Spisak’s death sentence restored – the justices won’t bother to hear the Philadelphia activist’s case.
The justices may only issue a one-page order for the Third Circuit Court to reconsider whether Mr. Abu Jamal should have his death sentence re-instated, the group said.
“We have had 28 years of struggling to free Mumia, and now our numbers are growing – not diminishing,” stated Pam Africa, co-chair of the International Committee of Friends and Family of Mumia Abu Jamal, in Philadelphia. “Our goal now is to get people organized and educated about the case, and how the people can save Mumia’s life.
“Our faith is in the people, and their ability to put pressure on the people in power,” Ms. Africa said.
Mr. Bryan, during his Netherlands address, noted the importance of the movement in Germany to save Mr. Abu Jamal and the impact it would have on other nations. Organizers of the International Campaign to Save Mumia Abu Jamal reported that if the Supreme Court or the Third Circuit Court rules to re-instate his death sentence, three days after such ruling there will be demonstrations in Germany, Mexico and Greece in front of the U.S. embassies.
Saeed Shabazz is a staff writer for the Final Call, where this story http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/National_News_2/article_6550.shtml first appeared.