The international community’s unforgivable betrayal of the people of South Sudan


by Ann Garrison

KPFA Evening News, broadcast Jan. 5, 2014

KPFA Evening News Anchor Anthony Fest: Turning now to news from Africa, The New York Times reported on Friday that the U.S. has no direct plans for military intervention in South Sudan but is nonetheless “consulting” with Uganda and Ethiopia about sending their troops in to defend the South Sudanese government. Uganda and Ethiopia are two of the U.S.’ closest military partners on the African continent. Uganda borders South Sudan to the south, Ethiopia to the east.

Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, South Sudanese President Salva KiirHowever, the South Sudan Human Rights Society for Advocacy published a critique of Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni’s role in destabilizing South Sudan during the past year. Museveni, they wrote, has encouraged the South Sudanese government to put their faith in the Ugandan army’s military might to back up their own forces against internal political critics. KPFA’s Ann Garrison has more.

KPFA/Ann Garrison: The South Sudan Human Rights Society for Advocacy is based in both Juba and Kampala, the capitals of South Sudan and Uganda. In a statement published in the New York City-based Black Star News, they called South Sudan’s President Kiir and Uganda’s President Museveni an unholy alliance and called on the international community not to let Museveni destroy South Sudan.

The NGO also called the designation of Museveni as one of the central mediators in the Addis Ababa peace talks “an unforgivable betrayal of the people of South Sudan by the international community.” The U.S., U.K. and other nations, they wrote, should “rise up to prevent more bloodbaths fueled by Mr. Museveni in South Sudan.”

Two South Sudanese diaspora groups, one based in Washington, D.C., another in Toronto, issued similar statements, and representatives of each spoke to KPFA.

Gateluke Reat, of the Toronto-based North American Nuer Congress, said that the U.N. Mission in South Sudan ignored the progressive destabilization of the country as Salva Kiir violated the Constitution and became more and more dictatorial with the backing of Yoweri Museveni and his army.

Gateluke Reat: Uganda, with Museveni, has a history, in the Great Lakes Region, of destruction. Had it not been the case that the Ugandan army was in South Sudan, all this kind of thing would never happen, because Salva Kiir himself will not order the killing because he knows that if he does, he will be the first person to die.

But he has a back-up from Museveni and he has a back-up from the United Nations. Essentially the head of the United Nations doesn’t care, doesn’t care about the people dying every day. All he cares is to see Salva Kiir being in power.

The South Sudan Human Rights Society for Advocacy, in a statement published in the New York City-based Black Star News, called South Sudan’s President Kiir and Uganda’s President Museveni an unholy alliance and called on the international community not to let Museveni destroy South Sudan.

KPFA: Gatluak Peter of the Washington, D.C.-based Alliance for South Sudanese in Diaspora said that he does not want South Sudanese to keep killing each other, but that the only way to stop the war now is for Salva Kiir to step down and make way for a transitional government.

Gatluak Peter: We don’t want people to kill each other. We don’t want people to kill themselves. The only (reason) why people are fighting is to remove President Salva Kiir, who was elected but violated the Constitution that gave him the power. And then the people demand him to step down.

And then he went and pulled a gun and killed his own people. Now, what would you do? People are resolving to take him out from the power. If he’s now agreed to leave the power, there’s no reason for people of South Sudan to kill themselves.

These are brothers and sisters, and there shouldn’t be any reason for them to kill. And what the world should do is to come in and tell the president to leave. He has been in power since 2005. This is a long time for President Kiir, and he should leave the power.

KPFA: Despite his designation as a mediator in Addis Ababa, President Museveni threatened to cross the border and come after opposition leader Riek Machar, the deposed deputy vice president now commanding forces fighting Salva Kiir, which are reported to include divisions of the national army that have defected.

Members of Uganda’s own Parliament called on Museveni to stop recklessly warmongering and recuse himself as a mediator at the peace talks in Addis Ababa.

For Pacifica, KPFA and Afrobeat Radio, I’m Ann Garrison.

Oakland writer Ann Garrison writes for the San Francisco Bay View, Counterpunch, Global Research, Colored Opinions, Black Star News and her own website, Ann Garrison, and produces for AfrobeatRadio on WBAI-NYC, KPFA Evening News and her own YouTube Channel, AnnieGetYourGang. She can be reached at This story first appeared on her website. If you want to see Ann Garrison’s independent reporting continue, please contribute on her website at



  1. People do not seem to want to realize that while all are African, they are different ethnic groups and they have conflict just like the European ethnic groups did. Is Museveni the proverbial fox guarding the hen house?

    • Of course they have conflicts. Wherever there is preferential treatment of one ethnicity over another, there is conflict. In this case Salva Kiir was under pressure to dissolve his private army, the presidential guard that so many African heads of state seem to have, so he started dismissing only the Nuer soldiers. Mahmood Mamdani explained that in his Uganda Monitor essay, "The Way Forward," published in the Daily Monitor and in Aljazeera,….

  2. At least us whites are good at war. Niggers do it with sticks and AKs while whites with brains engineer actual weapons. No wonder the world think Niggers are dumb. No wonder the world doesn't care!!!!!

    • Unless there is some sarcasm here too subtle to detect, this comment by 'Civilized' is a good argument for 'moderation' or, if you will, censorship, by the site owners.

Leave a Reply