Support SF BayView
Donate or Subscribe to SF Bay View
Follow Us Twitter Facebook

Prisoners forced to submit to radiation experiments for private foreign companies

March 20, 2010

by Eddie Milton Garey Jr.

The Rapiscan Secure 1000 has been called a “virtual strip search.” It shows a person’s private parts but obscures the face. Bush’s Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff heads the so-called full body scanner lobby.
In Illinois, federal judges have allowed at least two lawsuits to proceed against correctional officials for using full body scanners to reveal the anatomy of both prisoners and visitors without removing their clothing. This is the very same device that airports are seeking to implement on some inbound flights to the United States.

The cases of Young v. County of Cook, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 64404(N.D. 111.), and Zboralshi v. Monohan, 616 Supp.2d 792, 798 (2006, N.D. Ill), explain, “A Rapiscan is a machine that uses ‘back-scatter’ x-ray technology to conduct a body scan.” There is no significant difference between using Rapiscan and computer tomography (CT scan) whole body scanning.

Despite the clearance of some CT scanners (Rapiscan), the FDA’s website shows that no data has ever been presented to the agency as to the safety of these devices and states that it has never approved these devices as being safe because “some Food and Drug Administration officials were worried that full-body CT screening scans (Rapiscans) ‘may be exposing thousands of Americans to unnecessary and potentially dangerous radiation’ and that CT scans of the chest delivered 100 times the radiation of a conventional chest x-ray … between .2 to 2 rads of radiation during a single scan.” See, e.g., Virtual Physical Ctr-Rockville, LLC v. Philips Med. Sys., 478 F.Supp.2d 840, 842-43(D. Md. 2007) and “FDA Raises Body Safety Issue” by Marlene Cimons in the Los Angeles Times, June 5, 2001.

The Federal Bureau of Prisons officials have been forcing inmates at USP Big Sandy to submit to random computerized tomographic whole body radioactive scanners. If they refuse to submit to these radiation experiments, prison officials are charging them with disobeying a direct order and subjecting them to a wide range of sanctions, including but not limited to loss of good time credits, resulting in an extended time in prison, even if they agree to be subjected to an ordinary visual strip search as a reasonable alternative to radiation exposure from the whole body scanner. These images are saved and viewed by male and female staff and available online to certain civilian populations.

Regulations at 28 CFR §§ 512.11 and 512.12 prohibit the government from using inmates for this type of experimentation and require them to give both the inmates and the public notice of their intent to use inmates as test subjects as well as all of the possible effects related to being subjected to any such experimentation – and then only on a voluntary basis. See also Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551(4) and 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)-(d).

Federal regulations also prohibit the use of x-ray, MRI or similar devices on inmates for any reason other than legitimate medical purposes or only when there exists reasonable suspicion that the inmate has recently secreted contraband – and then only by a licensed practitioner in the manner set out in 28 CFR §§ 552.13(b)(1) and 541.48.

The government has been forcing prisoners, the majority of whom are Blacks and Hispanics, to be subject of these types of inhumane experiments for years. They recall the Tuskegee experiments, where 400 Black men were allowed to suffer with syphilis for 40 years so that doctors could study the disease. Also, Dr. Albert Kilgman, at Holmesburg Prison near Philadelphia, under the direction of major pharmaceutical companies like Merck and Dupont, exposed Black prisoners to herpes, gonorrhea, malaria, dysentery and even athlete’s foot from the 1950s to the 1970s.

In 1952 over 300 Black inmates at an Ohio state prison were injected with live cancer cells so that doctors at the Sloan-Kettering Institute could study the effects. In these cases the research subjects’ rights were violated because either they were not told that they were participating in an experiment or the government knew the experiments had no therapeutic value, or both.

Other cases include Heinrich v. Sthemet, 62 F.Supp.2d 282(D.Mass. 1999) (government utilized false pretenses to lure plaintiffs into participating in radiation experiments which the government knew had no therapeutic value); Stadt v. Univ. of Rochester, 921 F.Supp. 1023 (W.D.N.Y. 1996) (plaintiff, who thought she was receiving medical treatment for scleroderma, was injected with plutonium without her knowledge or consent as part of a U.S. Army study); In re Cincinnati Radiation Litig., 874 F.Supp. 796 (S.D. Ohio 1995) (plaintiffs were not informed that the radiation they were receiving from the Department of Defense was part of a military experiment rather than treatment of their cancer).

In Allen v. United States, 588 F.Supp. 247, 399 (D. Ut. 1984), the court held that it is becoming established that shortening of life span is a general effect of whole body exposure to ionizing radiation. Experiments have also shown a similar reduction may be caused by irradiation of substantial portions of the body from ingestion of radioactive materials.

In all of those cases, both the state and federal government had told the subjects that they experimented on that the radiation levels were harmless – only for the victims to learn later that they were in fact not harmless, but deadly!

It has also been reported that these whole body Rapiscan scanners have been malfunctioning. They have caused electrical shocks as in the case of Carrie Milton v. Rapiscan, 2005 U.S. Dist. Lexis 11574(E.D. La.). An airport security screener was severely shocked and suffered permanent injury to her hand operating one of these Rapiscans.

Independent tests on Rapiscan devices have also shown that the EEPROM chips, which are used to calibrate the radiation levels of the whole body scanners, have repeatedly malfunctioned, resulting in greater radiation exposure than Rapiscan reports on its own websites. Some prisoners have experienced blurriness of vision, headaches and groin pains after being subjected to these whole body radiation scans. Many of these prisoners have been Rapiscanned up to three times in a single day, even though they never left the institution or had any contact with anyone outside the institution.

In the 1960s and ‘70s the Bureau of Prisons forced inmates – mostly Black and Hispanic prisoners – to submit to radiation exposure to their testes in order to study the effects. See the case of Bibea v. Pacific Norththemst Research, 980 F. Supp. 349(D.Or. 1997); See also, Clay v. Martin, 509 F.2d 109(2d. Cir. 1974) (“The court reversed the decision that dismissed … prisoner’s complaint against defendants, federal government and prison officials, holding that it was against public policy to dismiss the complaint on pleading technicalities because the action involved experimentation on humans.”)

Other experiments include testing psychotropic narcotics on inmates who have not been prescribed them just to see their effects, such as in the recent case of Walker v. Hastings, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 80924, Case No. 09-CV-074-ART(E.D. KY). Walker was diagnosed with H Pylori, a bacterium that can infect one’s stomach or intestines, but was given Zyprexa, a psychotropic narcotic on at least nine different occasions by a prison pharmacist at USP Big Sandy seeking to test the effects of the medications for pharmaceutical companies.

If this is a legitimate security concern and not for the mere use of inmates as test subjects for private interests of companies like Rapiscan Corp., then ask the Obama administration, Eric Holder and Department of Justice officials why are they threatening inmates and charging them with disciplinary infractions for disobeying unlawful orders to submit to these radiation experiments, even when they are willing to submit to an ordinary strip search?

Update: Record long lockdown punishes cross-racial unity

The inmates have only refused to be exposed to harmful amounts of radiation and not to be the subject of a human radiation experiment, but they never disobeyed any lawful orders. Yet on March 1, the warden at USP Big Sandy imposed a lockdown that is expected to last at least two months.

The lockdown is clearly in retaliation against Black prisoners for exercising their First Amendment rights to petition the government for redress of grievances. Since this prison has been open, no lockdown has lasted more than 21 days – not even when there were repeated back-to-back murders.

But when all the inmates have found common ground for unifying lawfully, the federal white overseers have deemed this to be a threat to the order, security and discipline of the institution.

This warden finds it a serious security threat when all of the different factions of inmates decide not to focus on killing one another but on coming together in peaceful, lawful challenges to tyrants’ abuse of power in total, reckless disregard of our basic human rights and bodily integrity. Even the skinheads, Aryan Brotherhood and American Born whites came to an agreement with Blacks not to be subject to these human radiation experiments.

To my knowledge, there were no threats of violence, there were no assaults and there were no mass demonstrations – just individuals refusing to be the government’s test dummy for this Rapiscan x-ray product being illegally used on us in violation of the Code of Federal Regulations. But if we had ganged up on an inmate, no such lockdown would’ve occurred for more than a couple of days to a week. Imagine that!

Send our brother some love and light. Write to Eddie Milton Garey Jr., 91876-020, USP Big Sandy, P.O. Box 2068, Inez KY 41224.

9 thoughts on “Prisoners forced to submit to radiation experiments for private foreign companies

  1. Person of Interest

    A little fact-checking…

    First, it is not accurate to analogize the backscatter imaging devices to medical CT scanners (and worse to use CT interchangeably for backscatter through the piece). CT scanners use focused X-rays targeted in repeated shots through your body. The levels of radiation exposure in the most benign CT scan is still substantially more than (is supposed to be) in backscatter imaging.

    Next, radiation ≠ radioactive. X-rays are radiation (as, incidentally, is sunshine), they are not radioactive. Radioactivity connotes energy emitted from the decay of a radioisotope. High-energy X-rays, may be radiation, but they’re not radioactive.

    Backscatter imaging does use ionizing radiation, and I think it’s appropriate that it should be subject to FDA regulation. If there are quality control failures of the radiation controls of these products, there should be very serious consequences for the manufacturers.

    And if a device is subject to government regulation and approvals relative to the safety of use, it is appropriate that the device get those approvals before it is used on anyone without their informed consent…visitors to a courthouse, air passengers, and prisoners.

    Reply
  2. Sharon Jones

    It is absolutely appalling that these atrocities are being committed against people who are imprisoned and thus even less able than the general public to freely investigate the information they are given by “the authorities” and defend themselves against harsh reprisals for even attempting to help save one another’s health and well being. The fact that America is relying more and more on giving publicly traded companies lucrative prison contracts to take over prison operations for the government bodes even worse for prisoners today than ever. See “Dillon, Read & Co. Inc. and the Aristocracy of Stock Profits” by Catherine Austin Fitts at: http://www.dunwalke.com/introduction.htm

    Those who go into the prison business to make money are even more likely to have little or no scruples about what is done to increase the extent to which the imprisoned are capitalized upon by fellow human beings. Privateers have more fiscal incentives than government employees to look the other way at violations of right and merciless use of those behind bars for incidious purposes and entering a profession long known for providing opportunity to “power trip” at being deemed an authority figure in charge of a captive population. Wash’t it Kissinger who said “power is the ultimate aphrodisiac”? To my way of thinkiing there is something suspect about anyone who pursues employment in the prison system. Good old boy mentalities created and rule it. Racism is rampant and all types of abuses are epidemic. Those incarcerated are by definition cut off from communication with the outside world and locked within a microcosm of evil incarnate and anyone on site is either associated with those empowered or those unempowered. No ombudman or observer thus is there who might mitigate the potential for abuse that not only exists but has long been cultivated with impunity.

    Reply
  3. Tina

    This facility has been on lock down for 2 months. The inmates have been unable to speak with family/friends to tell them what the lockdown was about. I must say Im not surprised to see that it is due to the inmates refusal to be used for for monetary gain. There have been years of reported violence in this facility. Never has the lockdown been as long or as secret. Please if you have family or friends there write or call the Bop. Money and power really are the root of all evil.

    Reply
  4. Pete

    I fact-checked this article to see if I could forward it to my network and concluded that I can’t send it until you correct or explain your assertions on radiation levels, which seem unfounded. Rapiscan is claiming 10 Microrem per exam as compared to 1,000,000 Microrem for a CT scan (see epic.org/privacy/surveillance/spotlight/0605/rapiscan.pdf).

    Reply
  5. Cindy

    I have a loved one at Big Sandy, and he was forced to submit to one of these x-rays for no apparent reason or threatened with being put in segregated housing “The hole”. About week later he wrote to me complaining about feeling dizzy like he was going to pass out. He didn’t even know what the lockdown was about until I told him. They finally are off lockdown but now I hear that they are starting the x-rays again, and still threatening them with “the hole” and losing their jobs. My loved one just got a job with UNICOR and it would be a shame that he would be punished for standing up for his human rights. Especially since the inmates are willing to submit to a full body search. Something needs to be done about this.

    Reply
  6. Maria Molina

    Does anyone have family or information about the private prison called North fork facility in Sayre, Ok. It is run by the CCA. It seems to be a research institute. CA governor has been sending ca prisoners exspecially
    inmates that they have marked as gang members. Law inforcement and the governor says they are sending inmates there to keep them away from their family and to cut off ties with associates. If this is true why are the prisoners from different parts of California being sent to this certain prison when they will have contact with each other that is still associating. That prison seems to have no visitation and they will not return our calls. I’m worried because we hardly receive calls fr our loved one and when we do they seem to have been in lockdown. Why are these inmates at a prison that’s a research institute and in the middle of no where with no visitation. My son told me the doctors there said he had an eye condition and if he did not get surgery now he would loose his eye sight. He has never had eye problems. I also read that North Fork prison recently signed a concract
    with a blind school/research institute that is in Ok.

    Reply
  7. Dr. Stewart

    If they implemented this in the airports, would they be telling everyone so that the passengers know that they are being "checked out" when they are being scanned?! I feel like this would encourage a lot of sexual problems.

    Reply
  8. Lewis King Jr

    yo i was there in big sandy for four years and the things thay tryt to inpose on the inmates r just not right at all unfortunley people on the out side just dont care unless one of there love one is there but my prayer go out to the brother in big sandy the real hard knock life shot out to my ohio player my old cellmate marcus cobb serving a 100 years that is just racism at its finest shot out to the D.C niggas my chistian brothers and to the rest of u all on the out side looking in please contiue to support the rights of the inmates we all have sin and falling short of the glory of god so to my fellow american citizens the lease we all can do is at lease honor the little rights thay do have.Written by a former inmate at Big Sandy .God Bless all u brother

    Reply

Leave a Reply

BayView Classifieds - ads, opportunities, announcements
Emerging
Media Institute
Сhristinerice-freelancewriter.com
Freelance Writing,
Tips and Tutorials.
TOP STORES
RingCentral
Rebtel
Phone.com